TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging performance in guiding response to neoadjuvant therapy according to breast cancer subtypes
T2 - A systematic literature review
AU - Lindenberg, Melanie M.A.
AU - Miquel Cases, A.
AU - Retèl, Valesca P.
AU - Sonke, Gabe S.
AU - Wesseling, Jelle
AU - Stokkel, Marcel P.M.
AU - van Harten, Wim H.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Monitoring therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) is likely to improve NAC effectiveness in breast cancer(BC). Imaging performance seems to vary per tumour subtype(by ER and HER2 status), therefore we performed a systematic review on subtype specific imaging performance in monitoring NAC in BC. Studies examining imaging performance in predicting pathologic complete response(pCR) during NAC in BC subtypes were selected. Per study, negative- and positive predictive value, sensitivity(se) and specificity(sp), AUC and accuracy were derived. Fifteen/106 articles were included. Inter-study variability was revealed in: monitoring interval, response and pCR definitions. In ER-positive/HER2-negative BC, 181F FDG-PET/CT showed se/sp of 38%–89%/74%–100%, MRI showed se/sp of 35%–37%/87%–89%. In triple negative BC, 181F FDG-PET/CT showed se/sp of 0%–79%/95%–100%. 181F FDG-PET/CT showed in ER-positive/HER2-positive BC se/sp of 59%/80% and in ER-negative/HER2-positive 27%/88%. Evidence on imaging performance in monitoring NAC according BC subtypes is lacking. Consensus should be reached in: definitions of pCR, response and monitoring interval before starting well-designed studies.
AB - Monitoring therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) is likely to improve NAC effectiveness in breast cancer(BC). Imaging performance seems to vary per tumour subtype(by ER and HER2 status), therefore we performed a systematic review on subtype specific imaging performance in monitoring NAC in BC. Studies examining imaging performance in predicting pathologic complete response(pCR) during NAC in BC subtypes were selected. Per study, negative- and positive predictive value, sensitivity(se) and specificity(sp), AUC and accuracy were derived. Fifteen/106 articles were included. Inter-study variability was revealed in: monitoring interval, response and pCR definitions. In ER-positive/HER2-negative BC, 181F FDG-PET/CT showed se/sp of 38%–89%/74%–100%, MRI showed se/sp of 35%–37%/87%–89%. In triple negative BC, 181F FDG-PET/CT showed se/sp of 0%–79%/95%–100%. 181F FDG-PET/CT showed in ER-positive/HER2-positive BC se/sp of 59%/80% and in ER-negative/HER2-positive 27%/88%. Evidence on imaging performance in monitoring NAC according BC subtypes is lacking. Consensus should be reached in: definitions of pCR, response and monitoring interval before starting well-designed studies.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - ER
KW - HER2
KW - Imaging
KW - Neoadjuvant therapy
KW - Therapeutic response
KW - 22/4 OA procedure
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85015669834
U2 - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.02.014
DO - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.02.014
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28325260
AN - SCOPUS:85015669834
SN - 1040-8428
VL - 112
SP - 198
EP - 207
JO - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
JF - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
ER -