Impact assessment of multiple uncertainty sources on high flows under climate change

Ye Tian, YuePing Xu, Martijn J. Booij, Long Cao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the uncertainty ranges of high flows under climate change in Jinhua River basin, eastern China. Four representative concentration pathways (RCPs), three global climate models (GCMs), 10 downscaling parameter sets and three hydrologic models are applied to simulate future discharges. Changes of annual maximum discharges are assessed for the baseline period (1961–1990) and future period (2011–2040). The uncertainties of annual maximum discharges are calculated for each uncertainty source and compared with different combinations of them. The minimum temperature will probably increase all year round in the future period and maximum temperature would increase in most cases. The changes of precipitation showed different directions by different models and emission scenarios. The annual maximum discharges would decrease for all RCPs. The order of uncertainty ranges of high flows due to different uncertainty sources from high to low is: hydrologic models, GCMs, parameter sets in the downscaling method and emission scenarios. It must be noted that the small uncertainty contribution from different emission scenarios is due to the study period when the differences in increase of radiative forcing and greenhouse gas concentration are less obvious between different RCPs compared to the second half of the 21st century.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-74
JournalHydrology research
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

climate change
downscaling
global climate
climate modeling
twenty first century
radiative forcing
greenhouse gas
river basin
temperature
impact assessment
parameter
method

Keywords

  • METIS-316231
  • IR-100703

Cite this

@article{6d5ff131d1264dfa855c987867318881,
title = "Impact assessment of multiple uncertainty sources on high flows under climate change",
abstract = "This paper aims to investigate the uncertainty ranges of high flows under climate change in Jinhua River basin, eastern China. Four representative concentration pathways (RCPs), three global climate models (GCMs), 10 downscaling parameter sets and three hydrologic models are applied to simulate future discharges. Changes of annual maximum discharges are assessed for the baseline period (1961–1990) and future period (2011–2040). The uncertainties of annual maximum discharges are calculated for each uncertainty source and compared with different combinations of them. The minimum temperature will probably increase all year round in the future period and maximum temperature would increase in most cases. The changes of precipitation showed different directions by different models and emission scenarios. The annual maximum discharges would decrease for all RCPs. The order of uncertainty ranges of high flows due to different uncertainty sources from high to low is: hydrologic models, GCMs, parameter sets in the downscaling method and emission scenarios. It must be noted that the small uncertainty contribution from different emission scenarios is due to the study period when the differences in increase of radiative forcing and greenhouse gas concentration are less obvious between different RCPs compared to the second half of the 21st century.",
keywords = "METIS-316231, IR-100703",
author = "Ye Tian and YuePing Xu and Booij, {Martijn J.} and Long Cao",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.2166/nh.2015.008",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "61--74",
journal = "Hydrology research",
issn = "1998-9563",
publisher = "Nordic Association for Hydrology",
number = "1",

}

Impact assessment of multiple uncertainty sources on high flows under climate change. / Tian, Ye; Xu, YuePing; Booij, Martijn J.; Cao, Long.

In: Hydrology research, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2016, p. 61-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact assessment of multiple uncertainty sources on high flows under climate change

AU - Tian, Ye

AU - Xu, YuePing

AU - Booij, Martijn J.

AU - Cao, Long

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper aims to investigate the uncertainty ranges of high flows under climate change in Jinhua River basin, eastern China. Four representative concentration pathways (RCPs), three global climate models (GCMs), 10 downscaling parameter sets and three hydrologic models are applied to simulate future discharges. Changes of annual maximum discharges are assessed for the baseline period (1961–1990) and future period (2011–2040). The uncertainties of annual maximum discharges are calculated for each uncertainty source and compared with different combinations of them. The minimum temperature will probably increase all year round in the future period and maximum temperature would increase in most cases. The changes of precipitation showed different directions by different models and emission scenarios. The annual maximum discharges would decrease for all RCPs. The order of uncertainty ranges of high flows due to different uncertainty sources from high to low is: hydrologic models, GCMs, parameter sets in the downscaling method and emission scenarios. It must be noted that the small uncertainty contribution from different emission scenarios is due to the study period when the differences in increase of radiative forcing and greenhouse gas concentration are less obvious between different RCPs compared to the second half of the 21st century.

AB - This paper aims to investigate the uncertainty ranges of high flows under climate change in Jinhua River basin, eastern China. Four representative concentration pathways (RCPs), three global climate models (GCMs), 10 downscaling parameter sets and three hydrologic models are applied to simulate future discharges. Changes of annual maximum discharges are assessed for the baseline period (1961–1990) and future period (2011–2040). The uncertainties of annual maximum discharges are calculated for each uncertainty source and compared with different combinations of them. The minimum temperature will probably increase all year round in the future period and maximum temperature would increase in most cases. The changes of precipitation showed different directions by different models and emission scenarios. The annual maximum discharges would decrease for all RCPs. The order of uncertainty ranges of high flows due to different uncertainty sources from high to low is: hydrologic models, GCMs, parameter sets in the downscaling method and emission scenarios. It must be noted that the small uncertainty contribution from different emission scenarios is due to the study period when the differences in increase of radiative forcing and greenhouse gas concentration are less obvious between different RCPs compared to the second half of the 21st century.

KW - METIS-316231

KW - IR-100703

U2 - 10.2166/nh.2015.008

DO - 10.2166/nh.2015.008

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 61

EP - 74

JO - Hydrology research

JF - Hydrology research

SN - 1998-9563

IS - 1

ER -