Impact of accreditation on public and private universities: a comparative study

Kwame Dattey, Donald F. Westerheijden, W.H.A. Hofman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Based on two cycles of assessments for accreditation, this study assesses the differential impacts of accreditation on public and private universities in Ghana. Analysis of the evaluator reports indicates no statistically significant difference – improvement or deterioration – between the two cycles of evaluations for both types of institutions. A test comparing the two-cycle aggregated assessment scores between the two categories of universities, however, indicated a significant difference, with the public universities achieving better scores (improvements). Drawing on the evaluators’ reports and the opinions expressed by academics from both categories of institutions, the conclusion was that isomorphic pressures, largely faced by the private universities, accounted for their implementation of suggestions for improvement by the evaluators.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)307-319
    Number of pages13
    JournalTertiary education and management
    Volume20
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Sep 2014

    Fingerprint

    private university
    accreditation
    university
    Ghana
    evaluation
    Comparative study
    Accreditation
    Evaluator

    Keywords

    • IR-92042
    • METIS-305458

    Cite this

    @article{d570e6940331496ebf4d4609631f6dbb,
    title = "Impact of accreditation on public and private universities: a comparative study",
    abstract = "Based on two cycles of assessments for accreditation, this study assesses the differential impacts of accreditation on public and private universities in Ghana. Analysis of the evaluator reports indicates no statistically significant difference – improvement or deterioration – between the two cycles of evaluations for both types of institutions. A test comparing the two-cycle aggregated assessment scores between the two categories of universities, however, indicated a significant difference, with the public universities achieving better scores (improvements). Drawing on the evaluators’ reports and the opinions expressed by academics from both categories of institutions, the conclusion was that isomorphic pressures, largely faced by the private universities, accounted for their implementation of suggestions for improvement by the evaluators.",
    keywords = "IR-92042, METIS-305458",
    author = "Kwame Dattey and Westerheijden, {Donald F.} and W.H.A. Hofman",
    year = "2014",
    month = "9",
    day = "29",
    doi = "10.1080/13583883.2014.959037",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "307--319",
    journal = "Tertiary education and management",
    issn = "1358-3883",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "4",

    }

    Impact of accreditation on public and private universities: a comparative study. / Dattey, Kwame; Westerheijden, Donald F.; Hofman, W.H.A.

    In: Tertiary education and management, Vol. 20, No. 4, 29.09.2014, p. 307-319.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Impact of accreditation on public and private universities: a comparative study

    AU - Dattey, Kwame

    AU - Westerheijden, Donald F.

    AU - Hofman, W.H.A.

    PY - 2014/9/29

    Y1 - 2014/9/29

    N2 - Based on two cycles of assessments for accreditation, this study assesses the differential impacts of accreditation on public and private universities in Ghana. Analysis of the evaluator reports indicates no statistically significant difference – improvement or deterioration – between the two cycles of evaluations for both types of institutions. A test comparing the two-cycle aggregated assessment scores between the two categories of universities, however, indicated a significant difference, with the public universities achieving better scores (improvements). Drawing on the evaluators’ reports and the opinions expressed by academics from both categories of institutions, the conclusion was that isomorphic pressures, largely faced by the private universities, accounted for their implementation of suggestions for improvement by the evaluators.

    AB - Based on two cycles of assessments for accreditation, this study assesses the differential impacts of accreditation on public and private universities in Ghana. Analysis of the evaluator reports indicates no statistically significant difference – improvement or deterioration – between the two cycles of evaluations for both types of institutions. A test comparing the two-cycle aggregated assessment scores between the two categories of universities, however, indicated a significant difference, with the public universities achieving better scores (improvements). Drawing on the evaluators’ reports and the opinions expressed by academics from both categories of institutions, the conclusion was that isomorphic pressures, largely faced by the private universities, accounted for their implementation of suggestions for improvement by the evaluators.

    KW - IR-92042

    KW - METIS-305458

    U2 - 10.1080/13583883.2014.959037

    DO - 10.1080/13583883.2014.959037

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 307

    EP - 319

    JO - Tertiary education and management

    JF - Tertiary education and management

    SN - 1358-3883

    IS - 4

    ER -