TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of a collaborative data use model in a United States context
AU - Jimerson, Jo Beth
AU - Garry, Vanessa
AU - Poortman, Cindy L.
AU - Schildkamp, Kim
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported in this article was made possible by a grant from the Spencer Foundation ( #201800054 ). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Spencer Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Collaborative data use requires educator capacity in moving data to action to address root causes of student underperformance. Implementation of the model used in the present study has proved promising in European countries for building educator capacity and addressing problems-of-practice, but this model has not been studied in the United States (US), where structural issues and accountability factors present different challenges. In the present study, we explored enabling and hindering factors of the implementation in an elementary school in the US to better understand how differences in policy and practice contexts influence collaborative data use. Organizational structures and some policies in the US hindered implementation. Drawing on our findings, we suggest shifting thinking around data use to accommodate for both short cycles of data use (for straightforward problems) and intentionally slow cycles for stickier problems; furthermore, nesting collaborative data use within high-priority initiatives may help mitigate barriers to future implementations.
AB - Collaborative data use requires educator capacity in moving data to action to address root causes of student underperformance. Implementation of the model used in the present study has proved promising in European countries for building educator capacity and addressing problems-of-practice, but this model has not been studied in the United States (US), where structural issues and accountability factors present different challenges. In the present study, we explored enabling and hindering factors of the implementation in an elementary school in the US to better understand how differences in policy and practice contexts influence collaborative data use. Organizational structures and some policies in the US hindered implementation. Drawing on our findings, we suggest shifting thinking around data use to accommodate for both short cycles of data use (for straightforward problems) and intentionally slow cycles for stickier problems; furthermore, nesting collaborative data use within high-priority initiatives may help mitigate barriers to future implementations.
KW - Data-driven decision making
KW - Data-informed decision making
KW - Implementation
KW - School improvement
KW - Collaborative inquiry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081568549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100866
DO - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100866
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081568549
SN - 0191-491X
VL - 69
JO - Studies in educational evaluation
JF - Studies in educational evaluation
M1 - 100866
ER -