Abstract
Urban redevelopment projects at brownfield sites are challenging, especially when heritage conservation needs to be integrated into urban development plans. In these processes, close cooperation between various actors is essential to develop and implement plans. However, many projects seem to fail or opportunities are missed. This paper sheds light on the barriers and drivers in the planning process of these projects and shows that cooperation and interaction strategies might enable actors to implement joint ambitions. Therefore, we conducted a comparative case study of 10 urban redevelopment projects involving cultural heritage buildings in the Netherlands. Our results show that there is no standard strategy. Various cooperation arrangements and interaction types are effective in dealing with complicating contextual factors and conflicts in the planning process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-117 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | International planning studies |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 2 Jul 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Planning process, negotiation, brownfield projects, cultural heritage
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing joint ambitions for redevelopment involving cultural heritage: a comparative case study of cooperation strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver