Implementing Systems Engineering in the Civil Engineering Consulting Firm: An Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study explores the challenges that civil engineering consulting firms face in their projects when they apply Systems Engineering (SE). It is also explained were these firms should focus when improving the use of SE. To conduct this study, the methodology of Eisenhardt (Building theories from case study research, Acad Manage Rev 14 [1989], 532–550) for building theory from case study research is used. The extent, to which SE is applied, is assessed in six civil engineering projects, using a newly developed framework containing an extensive list of questions about how and why SE was applied. Based on this assessment, it is shown that there are three major reasons why SE was not applied to the full extent. First, SE procedures and responsibilities were not always clearly established and communicated to team members. Second, team members were in a learning process and did not yet possess all the SE knowledge and skills required. Finally, there was a lack of a demanding client to enforce the use of SE. This paper also presents recommendations for improving the application of SE in projects, related to methods, skills, and the client. Further research should focus on different (kinds of) companies within the civil engineering industry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-58
JournalSystems engineering
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

Civil engineering
Systems engineering
Industry

Keywords

  • METIS-316322
  • IR-100159

Cite this

@article{a278e5ad52bb4dbbb61f86951ada74f6,
title = "Implementing Systems Engineering in the Civil Engineering Consulting Firm: An Evaluation",
abstract = "This study explores the challenges that civil engineering consulting firms face in their projects when they apply Systems Engineering (SE). It is also explained were these firms should focus when improving the use of SE. To conduct this study, the methodology of Eisenhardt (Building theories from case study research, Acad Manage Rev 14 [1989], 532–550) for building theory from case study research is used. The extent, to which SE is applied, is assessed in six civil engineering projects, using a newly developed framework containing an extensive list of questions about how and why SE was applied. Based on this assessment, it is shown that there are three major reasons why SE was not applied to the full extent. First, SE procedures and responsibilities were not always clearly established and communicated to team members. Second, team members were in a learning process and did not yet possess all the SE knowledge and skills required. Finally, there was a lack of a demanding client to enforce the use of SE. This paper also presents recommendations for improving the application of SE in projects, related to methods, skills, and the client. Further research should focus on different (kinds of) companies within the civil engineering industry.",
keywords = "METIS-316322, IR-100159",
author = "{de Graaf}, {Robin S.} and Voordijk, {Johannes T.} and {van den Heuvel}, Len",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1002/sys.21336",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "44--58",
journal = "Systems engineering",
issn = "1098-1241",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Implementing Systems Engineering in the Civil Engineering Consulting Firm: An Evaluation. / de Graaf, Robin S.; Voordijk, Johannes T.; van den Heuvel, Len.

In: Systems engineering, Vol. 19, No. 1, 19.02.2016, p. 44-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing Systems Engineering in the Civil Engineering Consulting Firm: An Evaluation

AU - de Graaf, Robin S.

AU - Voordijk, Johannes T.

AU - van den Heuvel, Len

PY - 2016/2/19

Y1 - 2016/2/19

N2 - This study explores the challenges that civil engineering consulting firms face in their projects when they apply Systems Engineering (SE). It is also explained were these firms should focus when improving the use of SE. To conduct this study, the methodology of Eisenhardt (Building theories from case study research, Acad Manage Rev 14 [1989], 532–550) for building theory from case study research is used. The extent, to which SE is applied, is assessed in six civil engineering projects, using a newly developed framework containing an extensive list of questions about how and why SE was applied. Based on this assessment, it is shown that there are three major reasons why SE was not applied to the full extent. First, SE procedures and responsibilities were not always clearly established and communicated to team members. Second, team members were in a learning process and did not yet possess all the SE knowledge and skills required. Finally, there was a lack of a demanding client to enforce the use of SE. This paper also presents recommendations for improving the application of SE in projects, related to methods, skills, and the client. Further research should focus on different (kinds of) companies within the civil engineering industry.

AB - This study explores the challenges that civil engineering consulting firms face in their projects when they apply Systems Engineering (SE). It is also explained were these firms should focus when improving the use of SE. To conduct this study, the methodology of Eisenhardt (Building theories from case study research, Acad Manage Rev 14 [1989], 532–550) for building theory from case study research is used. The extent, to which SE is applied, is assessed in six civil engineering projects, using a newly developed framework containing an extensive list of questions about how and why SE was applied. Based on this assessment, it is shown that there are three major reasons why SE was not applied to the full extent. First, SE procedures and responsibilities were not always clearly established and communicated to team members. Second, team members were in a learning process and did not yet possess all the SE knowledge and skills required. Finally, there was a lack of a demanding client to enforce the use of SE. This paper also presents recommendations for improving the application of SE in projects, related to methods, skills, and the client. Further research should focus on different (kinds of) companies within the civil engineering industry.

KW - METIS-316322

KW - IR-100159

U2 - 10.1002/sys.21336

DO - 10.1002/sys.21336

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 44

EP - 58

JO - Systems engineering

JF - Systems engineering

SN - 1098-1241

IS - 1

ER -