Improving text recall with multiple summaries

Hans van der Meij, Jan van der Meij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. QuikScan (QS) is an innovative design that aims to improve accessibility, comprehensibility, and subsequent recall of expository text by means of frequent within-document summaries that are formatted as numbered list items. The numbers in the QS summaries correspond to numbers placed in the body of the document where the summarized ideas are discussed in full. Aim. To examine the influence of QS summaries on participants’ perceptions of text quality (i.e., comprehensibility, structure, and interest) and recall, an experimental – control group design compared the effects of a QS text with a structured abstract (SA) text. Sample. Forty psychology students participated voluntarily or received course credits. Method. Students first read a control (SA) or experimental (QS) text on flashbulb memory (FBM). Next, their perceptions of text quality were measured through a questionnaire. Recall was assessed with an open answer test with items for facts, comprehension and higher order information. Results. Perceptions of text quality did not vary across conditions. But QS did lead to significantly and substantially (d= 1.57) higher overall recall scores. Participants with the QS text performed significantly better on all item types than participants with the SA text. Conclusion. Studying a QS text led to a substantial improvement in recall compared to an SA text. Further research is needed to examine how readers study QS texts and whether a text model hypothesis or a repetition effect hypothesis accounts for the effectiveness. The first hypothesis posits that the QS summaries support the reader in constructing a text schema. The second attributes the effects of these summaries to their repetition of text topics
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)257-269
JournalBritish journal of educational psychology
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 May 2012

Keywords

  • METIS-281695
  • IR-83745

Cite this

van der Meij, Hans ; van der Meij, Jan. / Improving text recall with multiple summaries. In: British journal of educational psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 82, No. 2. pp. 257-269.
@article{b19c7abe317f4fc888e4a6a0c83b625e,
title = "Improving text recall with multiple summaries",
abstract = "Background. QuikScan (QS) is an innovative design that aims to improve accessibility, comprehensibility, and subsequent recall of expository text by means of frequent within-document summaries that are formatted as numbered list items. The numbers in the QS summaries correspond to numbers placed in the body of the document where the summarized ideas are discussed in full. Aim. To examine the influence of QS summaries on participants’ perceptions of text quality (i.e., comprehensibility, structure, and interest) and recall, an experimental – control group design compared the effects of a QS text with a structured abstract (SA) text. Sample. Forty psychology students participated voluntarily or received course credits. Method. Students first read a control (SA) or experimental (QS) text on flashbulb memory (FBM). Next, their perceptions of text quality were measured through a questionnaire. Recall was assessed with an open answer test with items for facts, comprehension and higher order information. Results. Perceptions of text quality did not vary across conditions. But QS did lead to significantly and substantially (d= 1.57) higher overall recall scores. Participants with the QS text performed significantly better on all item types than participants with the SA text. Conclusion. Studying a QS text led to a substantial improvement in recall compared to an SA text. Further research is needed to examine how readers study QS texts and whether a text model hypothesis or a repetition effect hypothesis accounts for the effectiveness. The first hypothesis posits that the QS summaries support the reader in constructing a text schema. The second attributes the effects of these summaries to their repetition of text topics",
keywords = "METIS-281695, IR-83745",
author = "{van der Meij}, Hans and {van der Meij}, Jan",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02024.x",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "82",
pages = "257--269",
journal = "British journal of educational psychology",
issn = "0007-0998",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Improving text recall with multiple summaries. / van der Meij, Hans; van der Meij, Jan.

In: British journal of educational psychology, Vol. 82, No. 2, 18.05.2012, p. 257-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving text recall with multiple summaries

AU - van der Meij, Hans

AU - van der Meij, Jan

PY - 2012/5/18

Y1 - 2012/5/18

N2 - Background. QuikScan (QS) is an innovative design that aims to improve accessibility, comprehensibility, and subsequent recall of expository text by means of frequent within-document summaries that are formatted as numbered list items. The numbers in the QS summaries correspond to numbers placed in the body of the document where the summarized ideas are discussed in full. Aim. To examine the influence of QS summaries on participants’ perceptions of text quality (i.e., comprehensibility, structure, and interest) and recall, an experimental – control group design compared the effects of a QS text with a structured abstract (SA) text. Sample. Forty psychology students participated voluntarily or received course credits. Method. Students first read a control (SA) or experimental (QS) text on flashbulb memory (FBM). Next, their perceptions of text quality were measured through a questionnaire. Recall was assessed with an open answer test with items for facts, comprehension and higher order information. Results. Perceptions of text quality did not vary across conditions. But QS did lead to significantly and substantially (d= 1.57) higher overall recall scores. Participants with the QS text performed significantly better on all item types than participants with the SA text. Conclusion. Studying a QS text led to a substantial improvement in recall compared to an SA text. Further research is needed to examine how readers study QS texts and whether a text model hypothesis or a repetition effect hypothesis accounts for the effectiveness. The first hypothesis posits that the QS summaries support the reader in constructing a text schema. The second attributes the effects of these summaries to their repetition of text topics

AB - Background. QuikScan (QS) is an innovative design that aims to improve accessibility, comprehensibility, and subsequent recall of expository text by means of frequent within-document summaries that are formatted as numbered list items. The numbers in the QS summaries correspond to numbers placed in the body of the document where the summarized ideas are discussed in full. Aim. To examine the influence of QS summaries on participants’ perceptions of text quality (i.e., comprehensibility, structure, and interest) and recall, an experimental – control group design compared the effects of a QS text with a structured abstract (SA) text. Sample. Forty psychology students participated voluntarily or received course credits. Method. Students first read a control (SA) or experimental (QS) text on flashbulb memory (FBM). Next, their perceptions of text quality were measured through a questionnaire. Recall was assessed with an open answer test with items for facts, comprehension and higher order information. Results. Perceptions of text quality did not vary across conditions. But QS did lead to significantly and substantially (d= 1.57) higher overall recall scores. Participants with the QS text performed significantly better on all item types than participants with the SA text. Conclusion. Studying a QS text led to a substantial improvement in recall compared to an SA text. Further research is needed to examine how readers study QS texts and whether a text model hypothesis or a repetition effect hypothesis accounts for the effectiveness. The first hypothesis posits that the QS summaries support the reader in constructing a text schema. The second attributes the effects of these summaries to their repetition of text topics

KW - METIS-281695

KW - IR-83745

U2 - 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02024.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02024.x

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 257

EP - 269

JO - British journal of educational psychology

JF - British journal of educational psychology

SN - 0007-0998

IS - 2

ER -