Abstract
Background: Careful identification of nerves during head and neck surgery is essential to prevent nerve damage. Currently, nerves are identified based on anatomy and appearance, optionally combined with electromyography (EMG). In challenging cases, nerve damage is reported in up to 50%. Recently, optical techniques, like diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) show potential to improve nerve identification. Methods: 212 intra-operative DRS/FS measurements were performed. Small nerve branches (1-3 mm), on near-nerve adipose tissue, muscle and subcutaneous fat were measured during 11 surgical procedures. Tissue identification was based on quantified concentrations of optical absorbers and scattering parameters. Results: Clinically comprehensive parameters showed significant differences (<0.05) between the tissues. Classification using k-Nearest Neighbor resulted in 100% sensitivity and a specificity of 83% (accuracy 91%), for the identification of nerve against surrounding tissues. Conclusions: DRS/FS is a potentially useful intraoperative tool for identification of nerves from adjacent tissues. Level of Evidence: Observational proof of principle study.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 349-355 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 9 Aug 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
- DRS
- Head and heck
- peripheral nerves
- surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In vivo nerve identification in head and neck surgery using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver