Incidence and predictive factors for endograft limb patency of the fenestrated Anaconda endograft used for complex endovascular aneurysm repair

The Fenestrated Anaconda Study group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
86 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: In the present study, we have described the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of treatment of limb occlusion for patients who had undergone treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with the fenestrated Anaconda endograft (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, UK).

Methods: Between June 2010 and May 2018, 335 patients had undergone elective fenestrated aortic aneurysm repair at 11 participating centers using the fenestrated Anaconda endograft with a median follow-up of 14.3 months (interquartile range, 27.4 months). The primary outcome measure was freedom from limb occlusion. The secondary outcome measures were freedom from limb-related reintervention, secondary patency, and the risk factors associated with limb occlusion.

Results: Of the 335 patients, 30 (9.0%) had presented with limb occlusion during follow-up with a freedom from limb occlusion rate of 98.5%, 91.2%, and 81.7% at 30 days and 1 and 5 years, respectively. In 87% of the cases, no obvious cause for limb occlusion was documented. Primary occlusion had occurred within 30 days in 36.7% and within 1 year in 80.0%. Of the 30 patients, 23 (77%) had undergone an occlusion-related reintervention and 7 (23.3%) had been treated conservatively. The freedom from limb occlusion-related reintervention at 30 days and 1 and 5 years was 97.8%, 93.2%, and 88.6%, respectively. Secondary patency was 91.3% after 1 month and 86.2% after 1 and 5 years. Female sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-8.34; P =.01) was a statistically significant predictor for limb occlusion. A greater proportion of thrombus in the aneurysm sac appeared to be protective for limb occlusion (0% vs <25%: OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.63; P =.01; 0% vs 25%-50%: OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.57; P =.00; and 0% vs >50%: OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.38; P =.00), as did iliac angulation (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00; P =.04).

Conclusions: Limb occlusion remains a significant impediment of endograft durability for patients treated with the fenestrated Anaconda endograft, especially for female patients. In contrast, a high aneurysmal thrombus load and a high degree of iliac angulation appeared to be protective for limb occlusion, for which no obvious cause could be identified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1512-1520.e1
JournalJournal of vascular surgery
Volume75
Issue number5
Early online date15 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Keywords

  • Fenestrated endovascular repair
  • Limb occlusion
  • Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm
  • UT-Hybrid-D

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence and predictive factors for endograft limb patency of the fenestrated Anaconda endograft used for complex endovascular aneurysm repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this