Incidence and predictors of phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrilator recipients

K. Kraaier, A.H. Starrenburg, R.M. Verheggen, Job van der Palen, M.F. Scholten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are designed to deliver shocks or antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in the event of ventricular arrhythmias. During follow-up, some ICD recipients experience the sensation of ICD discharge in the absence of an actual discharge (phantom shock). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and predictors of phantom shocks in ICD recipients.

Methods: Medical records of 629 consecutive patients with ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy and prior ICD implantation were studied.

Results: With a median follow-up of 35 months, phantom shocks were reported by 5.1 % of ICD recipients (5.7 % in the primary prevention group and 3.7 % for the secondary prevention group; p=NS). In the combined group of primary and secondary prevention, there were no significant predictors of the occurrence of phantom shocks. However, in the primary prevention group, phantom shocks were related to a history of atrial fibrillation (p=0.03) and NYHA class <III (p=0.05). In the secondary prevention group, there were no significant predictors for phantom shocks.

Conclusion: Phantom shocks occur in approximately 5 % of all ICD recipients. In primary prevention patients, a relation with a history of atrial fibrillation and NYHA class <III were significant predictors for the occurrence of phantom shocks. In the secondary prevention patients, no significant predictors were found.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-195
JournalNetherlands heart journal
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • IR-83878
  • METIS-291629
  • Implantable defibrillator
  • Primary prevention
  • Secondary prevention
  • Phantom shock
  • Psychological consequences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence and predictors of phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrilator recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this