Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty

S.A.W. van de Groes, M.C. De Waal Malefijt, Nicolaas Jacobus Joseph Verdonschot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Recent clinical studies show an increased risk of femoral loosening in high-flexion TKA. Loosening seems to occur behind the anterior flange, which is covering both cancellous bone and cortical bone. It is important to optimize the interface strength between cement and both bone types to increase femoral component fixation. This study was performed to determine the cement–cortical bone interface strength for different preparation techniques. Material and methods A pure tensile and shear force was applied to interface specimens. The cortical surface area was prepared in three different ways: (1) Unprepared cortical bone with periosteum; (2) Periosteum removed and cortical bone roughened with a rasp; (3) Periosteum removed and three Ø3.2 mm holes drilled through the cortex. A reference group was added with a cancellous bone surface. Results The interface tensile strength of Group 1 was 0.06 MPa and the shear strength was 0.05 MPa. For Group 2, respectively 0.22 MPa and 1.12 MPa. For Group 3, respectively 1.15 MPa and 1.77 MPa. For cancellous bone a tensile strength of 1.79 MPa and a shear strength of 3.85 MPa were measured. Conclusion The strength of the cement–cancellous bone interface is superior to the cement–cortical bone interface. The preferred preparation technique of the cortical bone is to remove all the periosteum and drill holes through the cortex within the footprint of the anterior flange, to prevent cortical weakening. Clinical relevance Ultimately, the proposed preparation technique will lead to longer implant survival, particularly for prostheses which are used in the high-flexion range
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-190
Number of pages5
JournalKnee
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Bone Cements
Periosteum
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Shear Strength
Bone and Bones
Tensile Strength
Thigh
Prosthesis Failure
Cortical Bone
Cancellous Bone

Keywords

  • METIS-301805
  • IR-90978

Cite this

@article{a3fe741734944b30a1b895267b986f6c,
title = "Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty",
abstract = "Introduction Recent clinical studies show an increased risk of femoral loosening in high-flexion TKA. Loosening seems to occur behind the anterior flange, which is covering both cancellous bone and cortical bone. It is important to optimize the interface strength between cement and both bone types to increase femoral component fixation. This study was performed to determine the cement–cortical bone interface strength for different preparation techniques. Material and methods A pure tensile and shear force was applied to interface specimens. The cortical surface area was prepared in three different ways: (1) Unprepared cortical bone with periosteum; (2) Periosteum removed and cortical bone roughened with a rasp; (3) Periosteum removed and three {\O}3.2 mm holes drilled through the cortex. A reference group was added with a cancellous bone surface. Results The interface tensile strength of Group 1 was 0.06 MPa and the shear strength was 0.05 MPa. For Group 2, respectively 0.22 MPa and 1.12 MPa. For Group 3, respectively 1.15 MPa and 1.77 MPa. For cancellous bone a tensile strength of 1.79 MPa and a shear strength of 3.85 MPa were measured. Conclusion The strength of the cement–cancellous bone interface is superior to the cement–cortical bone interface. The preferred preparation technique of the cortical bone is to remove all the periosteum and drill holes through the cortex within the footprint of the anterior flange, to prevent cortical weakening. Clinical relevance Ultimately, the proposed preparation technique will lead to longer implant survival, particularly for prostheses which are used in the high-flexion range",
keywords = "METIS-301805, IR-90978",
author = "{van de Groes}, S.A.W. and {De Waal Malefijt}, M.C. and Verdonschot, {Nicolaas Jacobus Joseph}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.knee.2012.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "186--190",
journal = "Knee",
issn = "0968-0160",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty. / van de Groes, S.A.W.; De Waal Malefijt, M.C.; Verdonschot, Nicolaas Jacobus Joseph.

In: Knee, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2013, p. 186-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty

AU - van de Groes, S.A.W.

AU - De Waal Malefijt, M.C.

AU - Verdonschot, Nicolaas Jacobus Joseph

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Introduction Recent clinical studies show an increased risk of femoral loosening in high-flexion TKA. Loosening seems to occur behind the anterior flange, which is covering both cancellous bone and cortical bone. It is important to optimize the interface strength between cement and both bone types to increase femoral component fixation. This study was performed to determine the cement–cortical bone interface strength for different preparation techniques. Material and methods A pure tensile and shear force was applied to interface specimens. The cortical surface area was prepared in three different ways: (1) Unprepared cortical bone with periosteum; (2) Periosteum removed and cortical bone roughened with a rasp; (3) Periosteum removed and three Ø3.2 mm holes drilled through the cortex. A reference group was added with a cancellous bone surface. Results The interface tensile strength of Group 1 was 0.06 MPa and the shear strength was 0.05 MPa. For Group 2, respectively 0.22 MPa and 1.12 MPa. For Group 3, respectively 1.15 MPa and 1.77 MPa. For cancellous bone a tensile strength of 1.79 MPa and a shear strength of 3.85 MPa were measured. Conclusion The strength of the cement–cancellous bone interface is superior to the cement–cortical bone interface. The preferred preparation technique of the cortical bone is to remove all the periosteum and drill holes through the cortex within the footprint of the anterior flange, to prevent cortical weakening. Clinical relevance Ultimately, the proposed preparation technique will lead to longer implant survival, particularly for prostheses which are used in the high-flexion range

AB - Introduction Recent clinical studies show an increased risk of femoral loosening in high-flexion TKA. Loosening seems to occur behind the anterior flange, which is covering both cancellous bone and cortical bone. It is important to optimize the interface strength between cement and both bone types to increase femoral component fixation. This study was performed to determine the cement–cortical bone interface strength for different preparation techniques. Material and methods A pure tensile and shear force was applied to interface specimens. The cortical surface area was prepared in three different ways: (1) Unprepared cortical bone with periosteum; (2) Periosteum removed and cortical bone roughened with a rasp; (3) Periosteum removed and three Ø3.2 mm holes drilled through the cortex. A reference group was added with a cancellous bone surface. Results The interface tensile strength of Group 1 was 0.06 MPa and the shear strength was 0.05 MPa. For Group 2, respectively 0.22 MPa and 1.12 MPa. For Group 3, respectively 1.15 MPa and 1.77 MPa. For cancellous bone a tensile strength of 1.79 MPa and a shear strength of 3.85 MPa were measured. Conclusion The strength of the cement–cancellous bone interface is superior to the cement–cortical bone interface. The preferred preparation technique of the cortical bone is to remove all the periosteum and drill holes through the cortex within the footprint of the anterior flange, to prevent cortical weakening. Clinical relevance Ultimately, the proposed preparation technique will lead to longer implant survival, particularly for prostheses which are used in the high-flexion range

KW - METIS-301805

KW - IR-90978

U2 - 10.1016/j.knee.2012.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2012.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 186

EP - 190

JO - Knee

JF - Knee

SN - 0968-0160

IS - 3

ER -