Information, commitment and consensus: A comparison of three perspectives on delegation in the european union

Robert Thomson*, René Torenvlied

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three perspectives on delegation in the European Union are presented in this article. The transaction-costs perspective focuses on information asymmetries between policy makers and implementers. According to the commitment perspective, policy makers delegate authority as a solution to commitment problems. The consensus-building perspective views the decision to delegate as a trade-off between decisiveness and inclusiveness during the bargaining process. Hypotheses are derived from these perspectives regarding the amount of delegation to both the European Commission and to member states in legislation. From detailed information on eighty-six EU laws, there is some evidence for the transaction-costs perspective as an explanation of delegation to the Commission. With respect to delegation to member states, there is some evidence for both the transaction-costs perspective and the consensus-building perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-159
Number of pages21
JournalBritish journal of political science
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Information, commitment and consensus: A comparison of three perspectives on delegation in the european union'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this