Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance: A Meta-Analysis

Nina Rosenbusch (Corresponding Author), Michael Gusenbauer, Isabella Hatak, Matthias Fink, Klaus Meyer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Innovation offshoring (IO) has become a widespread management practice. Yet, evidence on the performance implications is inconsistent, and scattered across disciplines and contexts. We argue that the benefits firms can derive from IO depend on the institutional environment at home. Drawing on recent work on institutional theory in international business, we explore institutions that facilitate reverse knowledge transfer and/or institutional arbitrage with respect to innovation-related activities. The results of our meta-analysis that synthesizes evidence from 48 samples show that IO is related positively to innovation performance. As predicted, this relationship is moderated by differences in the institutional environments across countries. Specifically, when national innovation systems are weak at home, IO appears to enable institutional arbitrage strategy whereas Confucian cultures enable more effective reverse knowledge transfer. However, contrary to our expectations, the beneficial effects of IO appear to have diminished over time.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)203-233
    Number of pages31
    JournalJournal of management studies
    Volume56
    Issue number1
    Early online date23 Sep 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

    Fingerprint

    Innovation
    Institutional innovation
    Meta-analysis
    Offshoring
    Institutional context
    Innovation performance
    Industry
    Institutional environment
    Arbitrage
    Knowledge transfer

    Keywords

    • UT-Hybrid-D
    • Innovation offshoring
    • Innovation performance
    • Institutional arbitrage
    • Institutional theory
    • Meta-analysis

    Cite this

    Rosenbusch, Nina ; Gusenbauer, Michael ; Hatak, Isabella ; Fink, Matthias ; Meyer, Klaus. / Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance : A Meta-Analysis. In: Journal of management studies. 2019 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 203-233.
    @article{57f9f025e6b6442a94e6ec4b43c7f0f1,
    title = "Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance: A Meta-Analysis",
    abstract = "Innovation offshoring (IO) has become a widespread management practice. Yet, evidence on the performance implications is inconsistent, and scattered across disciplines and contexts. We argue that the benefits firms can derive from IO depend on the institutional environment at home. Drawing on recent work on institutional theory in international business, we explore institutions that facilitate reverse knowledge transfer and/or institutional arbitrage with respect to innovation-related activities. The results of our meta-analysis that synthesizes evidence from 48 samples show that IO is related positively to innovation performance. As predicted, this relationship is moderated by differences in the institutional environments across countries. Specifically, when national innovation systems are weak at home, IO appears to enable institutional arbitrage strategy whereas Confucian cultures enable more effective reverse knowledge transfer. However, contrary to our expectations, the beneficial effects of IO appear to have diminished over time.",
    keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Innovation offshoring, Innovation performance, Institutional arbitrage, Institutional theory, Meta-analysis",
    author = "Nina Rosenbusch and Michael Gusenbauer and Isabella Hatak and Matthias Fink and Klaus Meyer",
    note = "Wiley deal",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/joms.12407",
    language = "English",
    volume = "56",
    pages = "203--233",
    journal = "Journal of management studies",
    issn = "0022-2380",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance : A Meta-Analysis. / Rosenbusch, Nina (Corresponding Author); Gusenbauer, Michael; Hatak, Isabella ; Fink, Matthias; Meyer, Klaus.

    In: Journal of management studies, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 203-233.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance

    T2 - A Meta-Analysis

    AU - Rosenbusch, Nina

    AU - Gusenbauer, Michael

    AU - Hatak, Isabella

    AU - Fink, Matthias

    AU - Meyer, Klaus

    N1 - Wiley deal

    PY - 2019/1

    Y1 - 2019/1

    N2 - Innovation offshoring (IO) has become a widespread management practice. Yet, evidence on the performance implications is inconsistent, and scattered across disciplines and contexts. We argue that the benefits firms can derive from IO depend on the institutional environment at home. Drawing on recent work on institutional theory in international business, we explore institutions that facilitate reverse knowledge transfer and/or institutional arbitrage with respect to innovation-related activities. The results of our meta-analysis that synthesizes evidence from 48 samples show that IO is related positively to innovation performance. As predicted, this relationship is moderated by differences in the institutional environments across countries. Specifically, when national innovation systems are weak at home, IO appears to enable institutional arbitrage strategy whereas Confucian cultures enable more effective reverse knowledge transfer. However, contrary to our expectations, the beneficial effects of IO appear to have diminished over time.

    AB - Innovation offshoring (IO) has become a widespread management practice. Yet, evidence on the performance implications is inconsistent, and scattered across disciplines and contexts. We argue that the benefits firms can derive from IO depend on the institutional environment at home. Drawing on recent work on institutional theory in international business, we explore institutions that facilitate reverse knowledge transfer and/or institutional arbitrage with respect to innovation-related activities. The results of our meta-analysis that synthesizes evidence from 48 samples show that IO is related positively to innovation performance. As predicted, this relationship is moderated by differences in the institutional environments across countries. Specifically, when national innovation systems are weak at home, IO appears to enable institutional arbitrage strategy whereas Confucian cultures enable more effective reverse knowledge transfer. However, contrary to our expectations, the beneficial effects of IO appear to have diminished over time.

    KW - UT-Hybrid-D

    KW - Innovation offshoring

    KW - Innovation performance

    KW - Institutional arbitrage

    KW - Institutional theory

    KW - Meta-analysis

    U2 - 10.1111/joms.12407

    DO - 10.1111/joms.12407

    M3 - Article

    VL - 56

    SP - 203

    EP - 233

    JO - Journal of management studies

    JF - Journal of management studies

    SN - 0022-2380

    IS - 1

    ER -