Abstract
Achieving sustainable resource management is essential to address the rising demand for ecosystem services. The absence of targeted vegetation restoration based on ecological function positioning has, nevertheless, made it challenging to effectively combat the ecological decline. This study attempted to classify four dominant ecological function areas based on the assessment of water conservation, soil retention, habitat quality, and food supply and determined the vegetation coverage threshold by exploring the trade-offs among ecosystem services and constraint effects between ecosystem services and vegetation coverage. The results highlighted the impacts of ecosystem services on vegetation coverage across the years 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 and established differentiated ecological restoration targets. The optimal vegetation coverage in the water conservation area was found to be 58%–63%, in the soil retention area was 52%–56%, in the food supply area was 34%–40%, and in the habitat quality area was 65%–70%. Finally, the study identified the subwatersheds with reasonable vegetation coverage, excessive restoration, and those that failed to reach the optimal vegetation coverage to develop targeted restoration strategies for each subwatershed according to its unique vegetation conditions. This study provides valuable insights into the specification of differentiated vegetation coverage targets and serves as a useful tool for more effective ecosystem planning and management.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5697-5712 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Land degradation and development |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 18 |
Early online date | 15 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Keywords
- 2024 OA procedure
- constraint effect
- ecological restoration
- ecosystem services
- threshold effect
- trade-offs
- adaptive management
- ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE