Integration of Well-Being Therapy and Positive Psychotherapy: A Response to Fava and Guidi's (2021) Commentary on Radstaak et al. (2020)

Mirjam Radstaak*, Laura Hüning, Ernst T. Bohlmeijer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The results of our study on the effects of well-being therapy (WBT) compared with a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition among individuals with residual symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were recently published in the Journal of Traumatic Stress (Radstaak et al., 2020). In a subsequent commentary, Fava and Guidi (2020) raised several conceptual and methodological issues that they asserted potentially limited the interpretation of the results. In this response, we aim to clarify these issues, thus contributing to the optimal interpretation of the findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-471
JournalJournal of Traumatic Stress
Volume34
Issue number2
Early online date14 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Integration of Well-Being Therapy and Positive Psychotherapy: A Response to Fava and Guidi's (2021) Commentary on Radstaak et al. (2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this