Interior Point Methods Are Not Worse than Simplex

  • Xavier Allamigeon
  • , Daniel Dadush
  • , Georg Loho
  • , Bento Natura
  • , László A. Végh

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We develop a new “subspace layered least squares” interior point method (IPM) for solving linear programs. Applied to an n-variable linear program in standard form, the iteration complexity of our IPM is up to an O(n 1.5 log n) factor upper bounded by the straight-line complexity (SLC) of the linear program. This term refers to the minimum number of segments of any piecewise linear curve that traverses the wide neighborhood of the central path, a lower bound on the iteration complexity of any IPM that follows a piecewise linear trajectory along a path induced by a self-concordant barrier. In particular, our algorithm matches the number of iterations of any such IPM up to the same factor O(n 1.5 log n). As our second contribution, we show that the SLC of any linear program is upper bounded by 2 n(1+o (1)), which implies that our IPM's iteration complexity is at most exponential. This is in contrast to existing iteration complexity bounds that depend on either bit complexity or condition measures; these can be unbounded in the problem dimension. We achieve our upper bound by showing that the central path is well-approximated by a combinatorial proxy we call the max central path, which consists of 2n shadow vertex simplex paths. Our upper bound complements the lower bounds of Allamigeon et al. [SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom., 2 (2018), pp. 140-178] and Allamigeon, Gaubert, and Vandame [No self-concordant barrier interior point method is strongly polynomial, 2022], who constructed linear programs with exponential SLC. Finally, we show that each iteration of our IPM can be implemented in strongly polynomial time. Along the way, we develop a deterministic algorithm that approximates the singular value decomposition of a matrix in strongly polynomial time to high accuracy, which may be of independent interest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-264
JournalSIAM journal on computing
Volume54
Issue number5
Early online date3 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Event63rd IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2022 - Denver, United States
Duration: 31 Oct 20223 Nov 2022
Conference number: 63

Keywords

  • NLA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interior Point Methods Are Not Worse than Simplex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Interior point methods are not worse than Simplex

    Allamigeon, X., Dadush, D., Loho, G., Natura, B. & Végh, L. A., Oct 2022, 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, p. 267-277 11 p. (IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS); vol. 2022, no. 63).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    36 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this