Interventions in education to prevent STEM pipeline leakage

Anniek Inge van den Hurk (Corresponding Author), Martina R.M. Meelissen, Annemarie van Langen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The so-called leaking STEM pipeline (dropout in STEM education)has been the subject of many studies. The large interest ofscholars in plausible causes of this leakage has resulted in anumber of meta-reviews describing factors at system, school andstudent level related to interest and persistence in STEMeducation. The STEM pipeline discussion has also resulted in alarge number of programmes aimed at enhancing STEM interestand persistence in STEM education. Although these programmeshave been widely evaluated, there seems to be no consensusabout which interventions are successful in raising interest inSTEM or persistence in STEM education. This study reports theresults of a systematic review of empirical studies in which theeffectiveness of STEM-related interventions are assessed. Initially,538 studies were found. The quality analyses showed that only afew of these evaluation studies are designed in such a way that itis likely that the found effects are caused by the intervention.Although some potentially effective interventions were found, thisreview shows that there is still a need for research into theeffectiveness of those programmes, especially with regard toprogrammes preventing talented and initially motivated STEMstudents to drop out of STEM education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-164
JournalInternational journal of science education
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

persistence
drop-out
education
subject of study
school system
cause
evaluation

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • STEM education; STEMinterest; STEM persistence;dropout; interventions

Cite this

van den Hurk, Anniek Inge ; Meelissen, Martina R.M. ; van Langen, Annemarie. / Interventions in education to prevent STEM pipeline leakage. In: International journal of science education. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 150-164.
@article{f7dd56b533f542858081aa0654cd3687,
title = "Interventions in education to prevent STEM pipeline leakage",
abstract = "The so-called leaking STEM pipeline (dropout in STEM education)has been the subject of many studies. The large interest ofscholars in plausible causes of this leakage has resulted in anumber of meta-reviews describing factors at system, school andstudent level related to interest and persistence in STEMeducation. The STEM pipeline discussion has also resulted in alarge number of programmes aimed at enhancing STEM interestand persistence in STEM education. Although these programmeshave been widely evaluated, there seems to be no consensusabout which interventions are successful in raising interest inSTEM or persistence in STEM education. This study reports theresults of a systematic review of empirical studies in which theeffectiveness of STEM-related interventions are assessed. Initially,538 studies were found. The quality analyses showed that only afew of these evaluation studies are designed in such a way that itis likely that the found effects are caused by the intervention.Although some potentially effective interventions were found, thisreview shows that there is still a need for research into theeffectiveness of those programmes, especially with regard toprogrammes preventing talented and initially motivated STEMstudents to drop out of STEM education.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, STEM education; STEMinterest; STEM persistence;dropout; interventions",
author = "{van den Hurk}, {Anniek Inge} and Meelissen, {Martina R.M.} and {van Langen}, Annemarie",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2018.1540897",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "150--164",
journal = "International journal of science education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Interventions in education to prevent STEM pipeline leakage. / van den Hurk, Anniek Inge (Corresponding Author); Meelissen, Martina R.M.; van Langen, Annemarie.

In: International journal of science education, Vol. 41, No. 2, 31.10.2018, p. 150-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interventions in education to prevent STEM pipeline leakage

AU - van den Hurk, Anniek Inge

AU - Meelissen, Martina R.M.

AU - van Langen, Annemarie

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2018/10/31

Y1 - 2018/10/31

N2 - The so-called leaking STEM pipeline (dropout in STEM education)has been the subject of many studies. The large interest ofscholars in plausible causes of this leakage has resulted in anumber of meta-reviews describing factors at system, school andstudent level related to interest and persistence in STEMeducation. The STEM pipeline discussion has also resulted in alarge number of programmes aimed at enhancing STEM interestand persistence in STEM education. Although these programmeshave been widely evaluated, there seems to be no consensusabout which interventions are successful in raising interest inSTEM or persistence in STEM education. This study reports theresults of a systematic review of empirical studies in which theeffectiveness of STEM-related interventions are assessed. Initially,538 studies were found. The quality analyses showed that only afew of these evaluation studies are designed in such a way that itis likely that the found effects are caused by the intervention.Although some potentially effective interventions were found, thisreview shows that there is still a need for research into theeffectiveness of those programmes, especially with regard toprogrammes preventing talented and initially motivated STEMstudents to drop out of STEM education.

AB - The so-called leaking STEM pipeline (dropout in STEM education)has been the subject of many studies. The large interest ofscholars in plausible causes of this leakage has resulted in anumber of meta-reviews describing factors at system, school andstudent level related to interest and persistence in STEMeducation. The STEM pipeline discussion has also resulted in alarge number of programmes aimed at enhancing STEM interestand persistence in STEM education. Although these programmeshave been widely evaluated, there seems to be no consensusabout which interventions are successful in raising interest inSTEM or persistence in STEM education. This study reports theresults of a systematic review of empirical studies in which theeffectiveness of STEM-related interventions are assessed. Initially,538 studies were found. The quality analyses showed that only afew of these evaluation studies are designed in such a way that itis likely that the found effects are caused by the intervention.Although some potentially effective interventions were found, thisreview shows that there is still a need for research into theeffectiveness of those programmes, especially with regard toprogrammes preventing talented and initially motivated STEMstudents to drop out of STEM education.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - STEM education; STEMinterest; STEM persistence;dropout; interventions

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2018.1540897

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2018.1540897

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 150

EP - 164

JO - International journal of science education

JF - International journal of science education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 2

ER -