Introduction

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Size of school organizations is a recurrent theme in Dutch education policy and has shown fluctuations in the past 20 years. From the mid-1980s until the mid-1990s the government policy has been strongly focused on stimulated scaling-up in all sectors of education, see e.g., the report “Scale and quality in primary education” (Ministerie van Onderwijs and Wetenschappen 1990). The expectation was that scaling-up would be both cost-effective and beneficial to the quality of education and the educational career opportunities for pupils (due to e.g., more choice within larger institutions, easier transfer opportunities to other programs, and more opportunities for professionalization and specialization of staff). From the perspective of school boards, school leaders, and government finally, scaling-up was seen as an important precondition for more decentralization and increased autonomy of schools and institutions. One of the assumptions was that by increasing the autonomy of schools and school boards a more differentiated curriculum would emerge (Onderwijsraad 2005; Ministerie van Onderwijs et al. 2008; NWO 2011; Van de Venne 2006).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSchool size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education
EditorsHans Luyten, Maria Hendriks, Jaap Scheerens
Place of PublicationDordrecht
PublisherSpringer
Pages1-5
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-06813-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Publication series

NameSpringerBriefs in education
PublisherSpringer International Publishing

Fingerprint

scaling
school
autonomy
school organization
education
professionalization
primary education
specialization
government policy
fluctuation
decentralization
pupil
career
leader
staff
curriculum
costs

Keywords

  • IR-93321
  • METIS-307355

Cite this

Scheerens, J., Hendriks, M. A., & Luyten, J. W. (2014). Introduction. In H. Luyten, M. Hendriks, & J. Scheerens (Eds.), School size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education (pp. 1-5). (SpringerBriefs in education). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06814-5_1
Scheerens, Jaap ; Hendriks, Maria A. ; Luyten, Johannes W. / Introduction. School size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education. editor / Hans Luyten ; Maria Hendriks ; Jaap Scheerens. Dordrecht : Springer, 2014. pp. 1-5 (SpringerBriefs in education).
@inbook{bf8f88699d8f4a9a8f2cccc37d0e5bad,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "Size of school organizations is a recurrent theme in Dutch education policy and has shown fluctuations in the past 20 years. From the mid-1980s until the mid-1990s the government policy has been strongly focused on stimulated scaling-up in all sectors of education, see e.g., the report “Scale and quality in primary education” (Ministerie van Onderwijs and Wetenschappen 1990). The expectation was that scaling-up would be both cost-effective and beneficial to the quality of education and the educational career opportunities for pupils (due to e.g., more choice within larger institutions, easier transfer opportunities to other programs, and more opportunities for professionalization and specialization of staff). From the perspective of school boards, school leaders, and government finally, scaling-up was seen as an important precondition for more decentralization and increased autonomy of schools and institutions. One of the assumptions was that by increasing the autonomy of schools and school boards a more differentiated curriculum would emerge (Onderwijsraad 2005; Ministerie van Onderwijs et al. 2008; NWO 2011; Van de Venne 2006).",
keywords = "IR-93321, METIS-307355",
author = "Jaap Scheerens and Hendriks, {Maria A.} and Luyten, {Johannes W.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-06814-5_1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-06813-8",
series = "SpringerBriefs in education",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "1--5",
editor = "Hans Luyten and Maria Hendriks and Jaap Scheerens",
booktitle = "School size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education",

}

Scheerens, J, Hendriks, MA & Luyten, JW 2014, Introduction. in H Luyten, M Hendriks & J Scheerens (eds), School size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education. SpringerBriefs in education, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06814-5_1

Introduction. / Scheerens, Jaap; Hendriks, Maria A.; Luyten, Johannes W.

School size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education. ed. / Hans Luyten; Maria Hendriks; Jaap Scheerens. Dordrecht : Springer, 2014. p. 1-5 (SpringerBriefs in education).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

AU - Scheerens, Jaap

AU - Hendriks, Maria A.

AU - Luyten, Johannes W.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Size of school organizations is a recurrent theme in Dutch education policy and has shown fluctuations in the past 20 years. From the mid-1980s until the mid-1990s the government policy has been strongly focused on stimulated scaling-up in all sectors of education, see e.g., the report “Scale and quality in primary education” (Ministerie van Onderwijs and Wetenschappen 1990). The expectation was that scaling-up would be both cost-effective and beneficial to the quality of education and the educational career opportunities for pupils (due to e.g., more choice within larger institutions, easier transfer opportunities to other programs, and more opportunities for professionalization and specialization of staff). From the perspective of school boards, school leaders, and government finally, scaling-up was seen as an important precondition for more decentralization and increased autonomy of schools and institutions. One of the assumptions was that by increasing the autonomy of schools and school boards a more differentiated curriculum would emerge (Onderwijsraad 2005; Ministerie van Onderwijs et al. 2008; NWO 2011; Van de Venne 2006).

AB - Size of school organizations is a recurrent theme in Dutch education policy and has shown fluctuations in the past 20 years. From the mid-1980s until the mid-1990s the government policy has been strongly focused on stimulated scaling-up in all sectors of education, see e.g., the report “Scale and quality in primary education” (Ministerie van Onderwijs and Wetenschappen 1990). The expectation was that scaling-up would be both cost-effective and beneficial to the quality of education and the educational career opportunities for pupils (due to e.g., more choice within larger institutions, easier transfer opportunities to other programs, and more opportunities for professionalization and specialization of staff). From the perspective of school boards, school leaders, and government finally, scaling-up was seen as an important precondition for more decentralization and increased autonomy of schools and institutions. One of the assumptions was that by increasing the autonomy of schools and school boards a more differentiated curriculum would emerge (Onderwijsraad 2005; Ministerie van Onderwijs et al. 2008; NWO 2011; Van de Venne 2006).

KW - IR-93321

KW - METIS-307355

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-06814-5_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-06814-5_1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-06813-8

T3 - SpringerBriefs in education

SP - 1

EP - 5

BT - School size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education

A2 - Luyten, Hans

A2 - Hendriks, Maria

A2 - Scheerens, Jaap

PB - Springer

CY - Dordrecht

ER -

Scheerens J, Hendriks MA, Luyten JW. Introduction. In Luyten H, Hendriks M, Scheerens J, editors, School size effects revisited: a qualitative and quantitative review of the research evidence in primary and secondary education. Dordrecht: Springer. 2014. p. 1-5. (SpringerBriefs in education). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06814-5_1