Involving Patients in Weighting Benefits and Harms of Treatment in Parkinson's Disease

Marieke Geertruida Maria Weernink, Janine Astrid van Til, Jeroen P.P. van Vugt, Kris L.L. Movig, Catharina Gerarda Maria Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Maarten Joost IJzerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
76 Downloads (Pure)


Introduction Little is known about how patients weigh benefits and harms of available treatments for Parkinson’s Disease (oral medication, deep brain stimulation, infusion therapy). In this study we have (1) elicited patient preferences for benefits, side effects and process characteristics of treatments and (2) measured patients’ preferred and perceived involvement in decision-making about treatment. Methods Preferences were elicited using a best-worst scaling case 2 experiment. Attributes were selected based on 18 patient-interviews: treatment modality, tremor, slowness of movement, posture and balance problems, drowsiness, dizziness, and dyskinesia. Subsequently, a questionnaire was distributed in which patients were asked to indicate the most and least desirable attribute in nine possible treatment scenarios. Conditional logistic analysis and latent class analysis were used to estimate preference weights and identify subgroups. Patients also indicated their preferred and perceived degree of involvement in treatment decision-making (ranging from active to collaborative to passive). Results Two preference patterns were found in the patient sample (N = 192). One class of patients focused largely on optimising the process of care, while the other class focused more on controlling motor-symptoms. Patients who had experienced advanced treatments, had a shorter disease duration, or were still employed were more likely to belong to the latter class. For both classes, the benefits of treatment were more influential than the described side effects. Furthermore, many patients (45%) preferred to take the lead in treatment decisions, however 10.8% perceived a more passive or collaborative role instead. Discussion Patients weighted the benefits and side effects of treatment differently, indicating there is no “one-size-fits-all” approach to choosing treatments. Moreover, many patients preferred an active role in decision-making about treatment. Both results stress the need for physicians to know what is important to patients and to share treatment decisions to ensure that patients receive the treatment that aligns with their preferences.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0160771
Pages (from-to)e0160771-
JournalPLoS ONE
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2016


  • METIS-317843
  • IR-101244


Dive into the research topics of 'Involving Patients in Weighting Benefits and Harms of Treatment in Parkinson's Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this