Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee?

T.S. de Windt, G.H. Welsch, M. Brittberg, L.A. Vonk, S. Marlovits, S. Trattnig, Daniël B.F. Saris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: While MRI can provide a detailed morphological evaluation after articular cartilage repair, its additional value in determining clinical outcome has yet to be determined. Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between MRI and clinical outcome after cartilage repair and to identify parameters that are most important in determining clinical outcome. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Collaboration. Articles were screened for relevance and appraised for quality. Guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement were used. Chi-square tests were performed to find variables that could determine correlation between clinical and radiological parameters. Results: A total of 32 articles (total number of patients, 1019) were included. A majority (81%) were case series or cohort studies that used similar standardized MRI techniques. The mean Coleman score was 63 (range, 42-96). For the majority of MRI parameters, limited or no correlation was found. Nine studies (28%) found a correlation between clinical outcome and the composite magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) or Henderson score and 7 (22%) with defect fill. In 5 studies, a weak to moderate correlation was found between clinical outcome and the T2 index (mean Pearson coefficient r = .53). Conclusion: Strong evidence to determine whether morphological MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcome after cartilage repair is lacking. Future research aiming specifically at clinical sensitivity of advanced morphological and biochemical MRI techniques after articular cartilage repair could be of great importance to the field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1695-1702
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of sports medicine
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Articular Cartilage
Cartilage
Knee
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Meta-Analysis
Chi-Square Distribution
MEDLINE
Cohort Studies
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Observation
Guidelines

Keywords

  • METIS-295490
  • IR-85314

Cite this

de Windt, T.S. ; Welsch, G.H. ; Brittberg, M. ; Vonk, L.A. ; Marlovits, S. ; Trattnig, S. ; Saris, Daniël B.F. / Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee?. In: American journal of sports medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 41, No. 7. pp. 1695-1702.
@article{e3c760e38ee74cb7a804f3ebefff175d,
title = "Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee?",
abstract = "Background: While MRI can provide a detailed morphological evaluation after articular cartilage repair, its additional value in determining clinical outcome has yet to be determined. Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between MRI and clinical outcome after cartilage repair and to identify parameters that are most important in determining clinical outcome. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Collaboration. Articles were screened for relevance and appraised for quality. Guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement were used. Chi-square tests were performed to find variables that could determine correlation between clinical and radiological parameters. Results: A total of 32 articles (total number of patients, 1019) were included. A majority (81{\%}) were case series or cohort studies that used similar standardized MRI techniques. The mean Coleman score was 63 (range, 42-96). For the majority of MRI parameters, limited or no correlation was found. Nine studies (28{\%}) found a correlation between clinical outcome and the composite magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) or Henderson score and 7 (22{\%}) with defect fill. In 5 studies, a weak to moderate correlation was found between clinical outcome and the T2 index (mean Pearson coefficient r = .53). Conclusion: Strong evidence to determine whether morphological MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcome after cartilage repair is lacking. Future research aiming specifically at clinical sensitivity of advanced morphological and biochemical MRI techniques after articular cartilage repair could be of great importance to the field.",
keywords = "METIS-295490, IR-85314",
author = "{de Windt}, T.S. and G.H. Welsch and M. Brittberg and L.A. Vonk and S. Marlovits and S. Trattnig and Saris, {Dani{\"e}l B.F.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/0363546512473258",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1695--1702",
journal = "American journal of sports medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "7",

}

Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee? / de Windt, T.S.; Welsch, G.H.; Brittberg, M.; Vonk, L.A.; Marlovits, S.; Trattnig, S.; Saris, Daniël B.F.

In: American journal of sports medicine, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2013, p. 1695-1702.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable in predicting clinical outcome after articular cartilage repair of the knee?

AU - de Windt, T.S.

AU - Welsch, G.H.

AU - Brittberg, M.

AU - Vonk, L.A.

AU - Marlovits, S.

AU - Trattnig, S.

AU - Saris, Daniël B.F.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: While MRI can provide a detailed morphological evaluation after articular cartilage repair, its additional value in determining clinical outcome has yet to be determined. Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between MRI and clinical outcome after cartilage repair and to identify parameters that are most important in determining clinical outcome. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Collaboration. Articles were screened for relevance and appraised for quality. Guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement were used. Chi-square tests were performed to find variables that could determine correlation between clinical and radiological parameters. Results: A total of 32 articles (total number of patients, 1019) were included. A majority (81%) were case series or cohort studies that used similar standardized MRI techniques. The mean Coleman score was 63 (range, 42-96). For the majority of MRI parameters, limited or no correlation was found. Nine studies (28%) found a correlation between clinical outcome and the composite magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) or Henderson score and 7 (22%) with defect fill. In 5 studies, a weak to moderate correlation was found between clinical outcome and the T2 index (mean Pearson coefficient r = .53). Conclusion: Strong evidence to determine whether morphological MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcome after cartilage repair is lacking. Future research aiming specifically at clinical sensitivity of advanced morphological and biochemical MRI techniques after articular cartilage repair could be of great importance to the field.

AB - Background: While MRI can provide a detailed morphological evaluation after articular cartilage repair, its additional value in determining clinical outcome has yet to be determined. Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between MRI and clinical outcome after cartilage repair and to identify parameters that are most important in determining clinical outcome. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Collaboration. Articles were screened for relevance and appraised for quality. Guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement were used. Chi-square tests were performed to find variables that could determine correlation between clinical and radiological parameters. Results: A total of 32 articles (total number of patients, 1019) were included. A majority (81%) were case series or cohort studies that used similar standardized MRI techniques. The mean Coleman score was 63 (range, 42-96). For the majority of MRI parameters, limited or no correlation was found. Nine studies (28%) found a correlation between clinical outcome and the composite magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) or Henderson score and 7 (22%) with defect fill. In 5 studies, a weak to moderate correlation was found between clinical outcome and the T2 index (mean Pearson coefficient r = .53). Conclusion: Strong evidence to determine whether morphological MRI is reliable in predicting clinical outcome after cartilage repair is lacking. Future research aiming specifically at clinical sensitivity of advanced morphological and biochemical MRI techniques after articular cartilage repair could be of great importance to the field.

KW - METIS-295490

KW - IR-85314

U2 - 10.1177/0363546512473258

DO - 10.1177/0363546512473258

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1695

EP - 1702

JO - American journal of sports medicine

JF - American journal of sports medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 7

ER -