Is the pay–performance relationship always positive? Evidence from the Netherlands

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    55 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study examines the widespread belief that executive pay should reflect firm performance.We compile a hand-collected data set of compensation paid to executive directors of Dutch listed companies and analyze if executive compensation is indeed determined by firm performance. A variety of accounting-based and capital market-based performance measures are used. The analysis also encompasses both contemporaneous and lagged relationships, and controls for firm, time and industry characteristics. Our robust empirical
    analysis fails to detect a positive pay–performance relationship. The finding questions the conventional wisdom that executive pay helps to align shareholder interests with those of managers. It is consistent with the view that powerful managers can influence their own pay. The results of the study suggest that other means of resolving agency problems and novel explanations of executive compensation may provide useful insights.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-60
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of multinational financial management
    Volume18
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • METIS-276973

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is the pay–performance relationship always positive? Evidence from the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this