Issues on Decentralized Consistency Checking of Multi-lateral Collaborations

Andreas Wombacher

doi:10.1109/WETICE.2005.43

Issues on Decentralized Consistency Checking of Multi-lateral Collaborations

Andreas Wombacher

Databases (Former)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

167 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations is based on propagating local information to trading partners until a fixed point has been reached. However, which information has to be propagated and how to represent this information is a challenge, because the local consistency decisions should derive consistency only if the collaboration is consistent. In this paper two scenarios are discussed arguing that history information about reaching a state must be propagated and that messages must be named uniquely in this history information to achieve the aimed equivalence of local consistency and collaboration consistency.

Original language	Undefined
Title of host publication	International Workshop on Distributed and Mobile Collaboration (DMC) (WETICE'05)
Place of Publication	Los Alamitos, California, USA
Publisher	IEEE
Pages	93-98
Number of pages	6
ISBN (Print)	0769523625
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2005.43
Publication status	Published - Jun 2005
Event	International Workshop on Distributed and Mobile Collaboration (DMC) (WETICE'05) - Linkoping, Sweden Duration: 13 Jun 2005 → 15 Jun 2005

Publication series

Name
Publisher	IEEE Computer Society

Workshop

Workshop	International Workshop on Distributed and Mobile Collaboration (DMC) (WETICE'05)
Period	13/06/05 → 15/06/05
Other	13-15 June 2005

Keywords

EWI-10466
IR-53863
METIS-227160

Access to Document

10.1109/WETICE.2005.43

Cite this

@inproceedings{9fe78a0d942247a7bfe817e65eb7c67d,

title = "Issues on Decentralized Consistency Checking of Multi-lateral Collaborations",

abstract = "Decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations is based on propagating local information to trading partners until a fixed point has been reached. However, which information has to be propagated and how to represent this information is a challenge, because the local consistency decisions should derive consistency only if the collaboration is consistent. In this paper two scenarios are discussed arguing that history information about reaching a state must be propagated and that messages must be named uniquely in this history information to achieve the aimed equivalence of local consistency and collaboration consistency.",

keywords = "EWI-10466, IR-53863, METIS-227160",

author = "Andreas Wombacher",

year = "2005",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1109/WETICE.2005.43",

language = "Undefined",

isbn = "0769523625",

publisher = "IEEE",

pages = "93--98",

booktitle = "International Workshop on Distributed and Mobile Collaboration (DMC) (WETICE'05)",

address = "United States",

note = "International Workshop on Distributed and Mobile Collaboration (DMC) (WETICE'05) ; Conference date: 13-06-2005 Through 15-06-2005",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Issues on Decentralized Consistency Checking of Multi-lateral Collaborations

AU - Wombacher, Andreas

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations is based on propagating local information to trading partners until a fixed point has been reached. However, which information has to be propagated and how to represent this information is a challenge, because the local consistency decisions should derive consistency only if the collaboration is consistent. In this paper two scenarios are discussed arguing that history information about reaching a state must be propagated and that messages must be named uniquely in this history information to achieve the aimed equivalence of local consistency and collaboration consistency.

AB - Decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations is based on propagating local information to trading partners until a fixed point has been reached. However, which information has to be propagated and how to represent this information is a challenge, because the local consistency decisions should derive consistency only if the collaboration is consistent. In this paper two scenarios are discussed arguing that history information about reaching a state must be propagated and that messages must be named uniquely in this history information to achieve the aimed equivalence of local consistency and collaboration consistency.

KW - EWI-10466

KW - IR-53863

KW - METIS-227160

U2 - 10.1109/WETICE.2005.43

DO - 10.1109/WETICE.2005.43

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0769523625

SP - 93

EP - 98

BT - International Workshop on Distributed and Mobile Collaboration (DMC) (WETICE'05)

PB - IEEE

CY - Los Alamitos, California, USA

T2 - International Workshop on Distributed and Mobile Collaboration (DMC) (WETICE'05)

Y2 - 13 June 2005 through 15 June 2005

ER -