Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making

Alexander van Oudenhoven (Corresponding Author), Matthias Schröter, E.G. Drakou, Ilse Geijzendorffer, Sander Jacobs, Peter van Bogedom, Laurent Chazee, Bálint Czúcz, Karsten Grunewald, Ana I. Lillebø, Laura Mononen, António J. A. Nogueira, Manuel Pacheco- Romero, Christian Perennou, Roy P. Remme, Silvia Rova, Ralf-Uwe Syrbe, Jamie A. Tratalos, Maria Vallejos, Christian Albert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Decision makers are increasingly interested in information from ecosystem services (ES) assessments. Scientists have for long recognised the importance of selecting appropriate indicators. Yet, while the amount and variety of indicators developed by scientists seems to increase continuously, the extent to which the indicators truly inform decision makers is often unknown and questioned. In this viewpoint paper, we reflect and provide guidance on how to develop appropriate ES indicators for informing decision making, building on scientific literature and practical experience collected from researchers involved in seven case studies. We synthesized 16 criteria for ES indicator selection and organized them according to the widely used categories of credibility, salience, legitimacy (CSL). We propose to consider additional criteria related to feasibility (F), as CSL criteria alone often seem to produce indicators which are unachievable in practice. Considering CSLF together requires a combination of scientific knowledge, communication skills, policy and governance insights and on-field experience. In conclusion, we present a checklist to evaluate CSLF of your ES indicators. This checklist helps to detect and mitigate critical shortcomings in an early phase of the development process, and aids the development of effective indicators to inform actual policy decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-426
Number of pages10
JournalEcological indicators
Volume95
Issue number1
Early online date14 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
ecosystem services
decision making
communication skills
development aid
governance
researchers
case studies
indicator
Decision making
Ecosystem services
decision

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
  • ITC-HYBRID
  • Science-policy interface
  • CSL
  • Credibility
  • Salience
  • Legitimacy
  • Feasibility

Cite this

van Oudenhoven, A., Schröter, M., Drakou, E. G., Geijzendorffer, I., Jacobs, S., van Bogedom, P., ... Albert, C. (2018). Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making. Ecological indicators, 95(1), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020
van Oudenhoven, Alexander ; Schröter, Matthias ; Drakou, E.G. ; Geijzendorffer, Ilse ; Jacobs, Sander ; van Bogedom, Peter ; Chazee, Laurent ; Czúcz, Bálint ; Grunewald, Karsten ; Lillebø, Ana I. ; Mononen, Laura ; Nogueira, António J. A. ; Pacheco- Romero, Manuel ; Perennou, Christian ; Remme, Roy P. ; Rova, Silvia ; Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe ; Tratalos, Jamie A. ; Vallejos, Maria ; Albert, Christian. / Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making. In: Ecological indicators. 2018 ; Vol. 95, No. 1. pp. 417-426.
@article{1851ddd3ac974e5b99b511651d1be068,
title = "Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making",
abstract = "Decision makers are increasingly interested in information from ecosystem services (ES) assessments. Scientists have for long recognised the importance of selecting appropriate indicators. Yet, while the amount and variety of indicators developed by scientists seems to increase continuously, the extent to which the indicators truly inform decision makers is often unknown and questioned. In this viewpoint paper, we reflect and provide guidance on how to develop appropriate ES indicators for informing decision making, building on scientific literature and practical experience collected from researchers involved in seven case studies. We synthesized 16 criteria for ES indicator selection and organized them according to the widely used categories of credibility, salience, legitimacy (CSL). We propose to consider additional criteria related to feasibility (F), as CSL criteria alone often seem to produce indicators which are unachievable in practice. Considering CSLF together requires a combination of scientific knowledge, communication skills, policy and governance insights and on-field experience. In conclusion, we present a checklist to evaluate CSLF of your ES indicators. This checklist helps to detect and mitigate critical shortcomings in an early phase of the development process, and aids the development of effective indicators to inform actual policy decisions.",
keywords = "ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE, ITC-HYBRID, Science-policy interface, CSL, Credibility, Salience, Legitimacy, Feasibility",
author = "{van Oudenhoven}, Alexander and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and E.G. Drakou and Ilse Geijzendorffer and Sander Jacobs and {van Bogedom}, Peter and Laurent Chazee and B{\'a}lint Cz{\'u}cz and Karsten Grunewald and Lilleb{\o}, {Ana I.} and Laura Mononen and Nogueira, {Ant{\'o}nio J. A.} and {Pacheco- Romero}, Manuel and Christian Perennou and Remme, {Roy P.} and Silvia Rova and Ralf-Uwe Syrbe and Tratalos, {Jamie A.} and Maria Vallejos and Christian Albert",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "417--426",
journal = "Ecological indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

van Oudenhoven, A, Schröter, M, Drakou, EG, Geijzendorffer, I, Jacobs, S, van Bogedom, P, Chazee, L, Czúcz, B, Grunewald, K, Lillebø, AI, Mononen, L, Nogueira, AJA, Pacheco- Romero, M, Perennou, C, Remme, RP, Rova, S, Syrbe, R-U, Tratalos, JA, Vallejos, M & Albert, C 2018, 'Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making' Ecological indicators, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020

Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making. / van Oudenhoven, Alexander (Corresponding Author); Schröter, Matthias; Drakou, E.G.; Geijzendorffer, Ilse; Jacobs, Sander; van Bogedom, Peter; Chazee, Laurent; Czúcz, Bálint ; Grunewald, Karsten; Lillebø, Ana I.; Mononen, Laura; Nogueira, António J. A. ; Pacheco- Romero, Manuel; Perennou, Christian; Remme, Roy P.; Rova, Silvia; Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe; Tratalos, Jamie A. ; Vallejos, Maria; Albert, Christian.

In: Ecological indicators, Vol. 95, No. 1, 01.12.2018, p. 417-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making

AU - van Oudenhoven, Alexander

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Drakou, E.G.

AU - Geijzendorffer, Ilse

AU - Jacobs, Sander

AU - van Bogedom, Peter

AU - Chazee, Laurent

AU - Czúcz, Bálint

AU - Grunewald, Karsten

AU - Lillebø, Ana I.

AU - Mononen, Laura

AU - Nogueira, António J. A.

AU - Pacheco- Romero, Manuel

AU - Perennou, Christian

AU - Remme, Roy P.

AU - Rova, Silvia

AU - Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe

AU - Tratalos, Jamie A.

AU - Vallejos, Maria

AU - Albert, Christian

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Decision makers are increasingly interested in information from ecosystem services (ES) assessments. Scientists have for long recognised the importance of selecting appropriate indicators. Yet, while the amount and variety of indicators developed by scientists seems to increase continuously, the extent to which the indicators truly inform decision makers is often unknown and questioned. In this viewpoint paper, we reflect and provide guidance on how to develop appropriate ES indicators for informing decision making, building on scientific literature and practical experience collected from researchers involved in seven case studies. We synthesized 16 criteria for ES indicator selection and organized them according to the widely used categories of credibility, salience, legitimacy (CSL). We propose to consider additional criteria related to feasibility (F), as CSL criteria alone often seem to produce indicators which are unachievable in practice. Considering CSLF together requires a combination of scientific knowledge, communication skills, policy and governance insights and on-field experience. In conclusion, we present a checklist to evaluate CSLF of your ES indicators. This checklist helps to detect and mitigate critical shortcomings in an early phase of the development process, and aids the development of effective indicators to inform actual policy decisions.

AB - Decision makers are increasingly interested in information from ecosystem services (ES) assessments. Scientists have for long recognised the importance of selecting appropriate indicators. Yet, while the amount and variety of indicators developed by scientists seems to increase continuously, the extent to which the indicators truly inform decision makers is often unknown and questioned. In this viewpoint paper, we reflect and provide guidance on how to develop appropriate ES indicators for informing decision making, building on scientific literature and practical experience collected from researchers involved in seven case studies. We synthesized 16 criteria for ES indicator selection and organized them according to the widely used categories of credibility, salience, legitimacy (CSL). We propose to consider additional criteria related to feasibility (F), as CSL criteria alone often seem to produce indicators which are unachievable in practice. Considering CSLF together requires a combination of scientific knowledge, communication skills, policy and governance insights and on-field experience. In conclusion, we present a checklist to evaluate CSLF of your ES indicators. This checklist helps to detect and mitigate critical shortcomings in an early phase of the development process, and aids the development of effective indicators to inform actual policy decisions.

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

KW - ITC-HYBRID

KW - Science-policy interface

KW - CSL

KW - Credibility

KW - Salience

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Feasibility

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2018/isi/drakou_key.pdf

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 417

EP - 426

JO - Ecological indicators

JF - Ecological indicators

SN - 1470-160X

IS - 1

ER -

van Oudenhoven A, Schröter M, Drakou EG, Geijzendorffer I, Jacobs S, van Bogedom P et al. Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making. Ecological indicators. 2018 Dec 1;95(1):417-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020