Knowledge bases and responsibility within regional innovation systems: reflections from the Twente region

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Increasing public investments in distributed platform infrastructures created new opportunities for economic growth and social welfare but simultaneously were associated with growing societal distrust in science’s power to solve societal problems. The concept of Responsible Research and Innovation was advanced as providing mechanisms to recouple science and society ensuring that research and innovation continues to uphold its societal duties. In this paper, we explore the extent to which it is possible to identify repertoires of responsible innovation behaviour within extant regional research and innovation networks through the way that these innovation networks draw on informal regional innovation resources. We distinguish two kinds of regional innovation network, those based on primarily synthetic knowledge bases, and those based on primarily analytic knowledge bases, in the eHealth sector where there are substantive societal concerns regarding responsibility and innovation. We contend it appears that the coupling of patients to innovation networks through their prior association with innovators (e.g. as patients) affects the scope for responsibility. We therefore contend that more attention is required for understanding the dynamics of citizen-innovator coupling in regional innovation networks if responsibility is to become a more common systemic property.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2491-2509
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean planning studies
Volume27
Issue number12
Early online date4 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

innovation
responsibility
innovator
regional research
common property resource
public investment
science
social welfare
economic growth
infrastructure
citizen
resource
resources

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • regional innovation systems
  • regional knowledge bases
  • Responsible Research and Innovation
  • science and technology policy
  • e-health

Cite this

@article{c383f58459c446749bdccaf24e9eaf16,
title = "Knowledge bases and responsibility within regional innovation systems: reflections from the Twente region",
abstract = "Increasing public investments in distributed platform infrastructures created new opportunities for economic growth and social welfare but simultaneously were associated with growing societal distrust in science’s power to solve societal problems. The concept of Responsible Research and Innovation was advanced as providing mechanisms to recouple science and society ensuring that research and innovation continues to uphold its societal duties. In this paper, we explore the extent to which it is possible to identify repertoires of responsible innovation behaviour within extant regional research and innovation networks through the way that these innovation networks draw on informal regional innovation resources. We distinguish two kinds of regional innovation network, those based on primarily synthetic knowledge bases, and those based on primarily analytic knowledge bases, in the eHealth sector where there are substantive societal concerns regarding responsibility and innovation. We contend it appears that the coupling of patients to innovation networks through their prior association with innovators (e.g. as patients) affects the scope for responsibility. We therefore contend that more attention is required for understanding the dynamics of citizen-innovator coupling in regional innovation networks if responsibility is to become a more common systemic property.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, regional innovation systems, regional knowledge bases, Responsible Research and Innovation, science and technology policy, e-health",
author = "Paul Benneworth and Verena Schulze-Greiving and Kornelia Konrad",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/09654313.2019.1635086",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "2491--2509",
journal = "European planning studies",
issn = "0965-4313",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "12",

}

Knowledge bases and responsibility within regional innovation systems : reflections from the Twente region. / Benneworth, Paul; Schulze-Greiving, Verena; Konrad, Kornelia.

In: European planning studies, Vol. 27, No. 12, 02.12.2019, p. 2491-2509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge bases and responsibility within regional innovation systems

T2 - reflections from the Twente region

AU - Benneworth, Paul

AU - Schulze-Greiving, Verena

AU - Konrad, Kornelia

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2019/12/2

Y1 - 2019/12/2

N2 - Increasing public investments in distributed platform infrastructures created new opportunities for economic growth and social welfare but simultaneously were associated with growing societal distrust in science’s power to solve societal problems. The concept of Responsible Research and Innovation was advanced as providing mechanisms to recouple science and society ensuring that research and innovation continues to uphold its societal duties. In this paper, we explore the extent to which it is possible to identify repertoires of responsible innovation behaviour within extant regional research and innovation networks through the way that these innovation networks draw on informal regional innovation resources. We distinguish two kinds of regional innovation network, those based on primarily synthetic knowledge bases, and those based on primarily analytic knowledge bases, in the eHealth sector where there are substantive societal concerns regarding responsibility and innovation. We contend it appears that the coupling of patients to innovation networks through their prior association with innovators (e.g. as patients) affects the scope for responsibility. We therefore contend that more attention is required for understanding the dynamics of citizen-innovator coupling in regional innovation networks if responsibility is to become a more common systemic property.

AB - Increasing public investments in distributed platform infrastructures created new opportunities for economic growth and social welfare but simultaneously were associated with growing societal distrust in science’s power to solve societal problems. The concept of Responsible Research and Innovation was advanced as providing mechanisms to recouple science and society ensuring that research and innovation continues to uphold its societal duties. In this paper, we explore the extent to which it is possible to identify repertoires of responsible innovation behaviour within extant regional research and innovation networks through the way that these innovation networks draw on informal regional innovation resources. We distinguish two kinds of regional innovation network, those based on primarily synthetic knowledge bases, and those based on primarily analytic knowledge bases, in the eHealth sector where there are substantive societal concerns regarding responsibility and innovation. We contend it appears that the coupling of patients to innovation networks through their prior association with innovators (e.g. as patients) affects the scope for responsibility. We therefore contend that more attention is required for understanding the dynamics of citizen-innovator coupling in regional innovation networks if responsibility is to become a more common systemic property.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - regional innovation systems

KW - regional knowledge bases

KW - Responsible Research and Innovation

KW - science and technology policy

KW - e-health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068618120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09654313.2019.1635086

DO - 10.1080/09654313.2019.1635086

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 2491

EP - 2509

JO - European planning studies

JF - European planning studies

SN - 0965-4313

IS - 12

ER -