Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge?

Johanna Gast, Katherine Gundolf, Rainer Harms, Elvin Matos Collado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coopetitors need to manage interorganizational knowledge flows to balance cooperative knowledge sharing and competitive knowledge protection. The question of how to balance these has received little research attention, with most studies analyzing knowledge sharing or protection separately. To address this gap, we develop a theoretical framework on coopetitive knowledge sharing and knowledge protection practices. This framework is based on a literature review of coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management. To complement and refine this initial framework, we build on insights from a qualitative study that gathered data from 11 semistructured interviews with key informants of Latin American firms. We show that a balance between knowledge sharing and knowledge protection in coopetition is facilitated when coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management helps coopetitors share general and project-specific knowledge while they withhold core knowledge about their firms and clients. To achieve this balance, firms combine formal and informal knowledge protection practices. As theoretical implications, we provide a fine-grained and synoptic understanding of the characteristics of knowledge management among coopetitors. As managerial implications, we call managers' attention to the need to find a balance between knowledge sharing and protection that will help clearly define what kind of knowledge is shared or protected when firms cooperate with rivals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-74
Number of pages10
JournalIndustrial marketing management
Volume77
Early online date31 Jan 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Competitors
Knowledge management
Knowledge protection
Coopetition
Knowledge sharing
Knowledge flow
Managers
Qualitative study
Theoretical framework
Literature review

Keywords

  • Cooperation
  • Coopetition
  • Interorganizational knowledge management
  • Knowledge protection
  • Knowledge sharing

Cite this

@article{ebf69a0d6fa94b26be83cc2426c88ca8,
title = "Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge?",
abstract = "Coopetitors need to manage interorganizational knowledge flows to balance cooperative knowledge sharing and competitive knowledge protection. The question of how to balance these has received little research attention, with most studies analyzing knowledge sharing or protection separately. To address this gap, we develop a theoretical framework on coopetitive knowledge sharing and knowledge protection practices. This framework is based on a literature review of coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management. To complement and refine this initial framework, we build on insights from a qualitative study that gathered data from 11 semistructured interviews with key informants of Latin American firms. We show that a balance between knowledge sharing and knowledge protection in coopetition is facilitated when coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management helps coopetitors share general and project-specific knowledge while they withhold core knowledge about their firms and clients. To achieve this balance, firms combine formal and informal knowledge protection practices. As theoretical implications, we provide a fine-grained and synoptic understanding of the characteristics of knowledge management among coopetitors. As managerial implications, we call managers' attention to the need to find a balance between knowledge sharing and protection that will help clearly define what kind of knowledge is shared or protected when firms cooperate with rivals.",
keywords = "Cooperation, Coopetition, Interorganizational knowledge management, Knowledge protection, Knowledge sharing",
author = "Johanna Gast and Katherine Gundolf and Rainer Harms and {Matos Collado}, Elvin",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "65--74",
journal = "Industrial marketing management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Knowledge management and coopetition : How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge? / Gast, Johanna; Gundolf, Katherine; Harms, Rainer; Matos Collado, Elvin.

In: Industrial marketing management, Vol. 77, 02.2019, p. 65-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge management and coopetition

T2 - How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge?

AU - Gast, Johanna

AU - Gundolf, Katherine

AU - Harms, Rainer

AU - Matos Collado, Elvin

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Coopetitors need to manage interorganizational knowledge flows to balance cooperative knowledge sharing and competitive knowledge protection. The question of how to balance these has received little research attention, with most studies analyzing knowledge sharing or protection separately. To address this gap, we develop a theoretical framework on coopetitive knowledge sharing and knowledge protection practices. This framework is based on a literature review of coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management. To complement and refine this initial framework, we build on insights from a qualitative study that gathered data from 11 semistructured interviews with key informants of Latin American firms. We show that a balance between knowledge sharing and knowledge protection in coopetition is facilitated when coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management helps coopetitors share general and project-specific knowledge while they withhold core knowledge about their firms and clients. To achieve this balance, firms combine formal and informal knowledge protection practices. As theoretical implications, we provide a fine-grained and synoptic understanding of the characteristics of knowledge management among coopetitors. As managerial implications, we call managers' attention to the need to find a balance between knowledge sharing and protection that will help clearly define what kind of knowledge is shared or protected when firms cooperate with rivals.

AB - Coopetitors need to manage interorganizational knowledge flows to balance cooperative knowledge sharing and competitive knowledge protection. The question of how to balance these has received little research attention, with most studies analyzing knowledge sharing or protection separately. To address this gap, we develop a theoretical framework on coopetitive knowledge sharing and knowledge protection practices. This framework is based on a literature review of coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management. To complement and refine this initial framework, we build on insights from a qualitative study that gathered data from 11 semistructured interviews with key informants of Latin American firms. We show that a balance between knowledge sharing and knowledge protection in coopetition is facilitated when coopetitive interorganizational knowledge management helps coopetitors share general and project-specific knowledge while they withhold core knowledge about their firms and clients. To achieve this balance, firms combine formal and informal knowledge protection practices. As theoretical implications, we provide a fine-grained and synoptic understanding of the characteristics of knowledge management among coopetitors. As managerial implications, we call managers' attention to the need to find a balance between knowledge sharing and protection that will help clearly define what kind of knowledge is shared or protected when firms cooperate with rivals.

KW - Cooperation

KW - Coopetition

KW - Interorganizational knowledge management

KW - Knowledge protection

KW - Knowledge sharing

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.007

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 65

EP - 74

JO - Industrial marketing management

JF - Industrial marketing management

SN - 0019-8501

ER -