Lessons learned from evaluating a checklist for reporting experimental and observational research

Roelf J. Wieringa, Nelly Condori-Fernandez, Maia Daneva, B.B. Mutschler, Oscar Pastor

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)
    228 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This short paper summarizes and discusses the result of an iterative construction and evaluation of a checklist for writing and reading reports about experimental and observational research.
    Original languageUndefined
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the ACM-IEEE Iternational Smposium on Empirical Sftware Egineering and Masurement, ESEM 2012
    Place of PublicationNew York
    PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
    Pages157-160
    Number of pages4
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4503-1056-7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2012
    Event6th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2012 - University of Copenhagen, Lund, Sweden
    Duration: 19 Sept 201221 Sept 2012
    Conference number: 6

    Publication series

    Name
    PublisherACM

    Conference

    Conference6th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2012
    Abbreviated titleESEM 2012
    Country/TerritorySweden
    CityLund
    Period19/09/1221/09/12

    Keywords

    • METIS-296095
    • Experimental and observational research
    • IR-81856
    • EWI-22300
    • IS-Design science methodology
    • SCS-Services
    • Unified checklist

    Cite this