Abstract
Ever since the Kyoto protocol became effective (1997), national governments have been
delegating climate policies to local governments. In the Netherlands, national climate policy has
been effective since 1999 while targeting at a multi-governmental approach. In 2010, a survey
found that local climate policies have been adopted by the vast majority of local governments
throughout the country. Therefore, obviously, the national government claims that their local climate
policy diffusion programs have been successful. This is, however, not the case. Whereas climate
mitigation strategies have indeed been adopted widely (Hoppe and Coenen, 2011), this cannot be
said for the adoption of adaptation strategies as this varies strongly across the country (Van den
Berg and Coenen, 2012). Moreover, the intensity of the implementation of local climate policy
varies strongly. In practice, local authorities often lack expertise and neglect local stakeholders in
the formulation of climate policy goals, which leads to unrealistic goal-setting (Hoppe, 2013; Van
Bueren and Steenhuisen, 2013). This paper analyses the development and current status of local
climate policy practices in the Netherlands, and addresses both the mitigation and adaptation lines.
Additionally, attention is paid to coupling these two strategies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 14 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Event | EURA Conference 2013: Cities as seedbeds for innovation - University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands Duration: 4 Jul 2013 → 6 Jul 2013 https://eura.org/eura-conference-2013/ |
Conference
Conference | EURA Conference 2013 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | EURA |
Country/Territory | Netherlands |
City | Enschede |
Period | 4/07/13 → 6/07/13 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Climate policy
- Cities
- Climate mitigation
- Climate adaptation
- Local governments