Making sure: A comparative micro-analysis of diagnostic instruments in medical practice

Cornelius Schubert*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article conceptualises diagnosis as ongoing practical judgement in medical care. Based on pragmatist and phenomenological considerations of tools in use, it uses a comparative approach to analyse similarities and differences in the use of diagnostic technologies. In the first part of the paper, a historical perspective on the innovation of the stethoscope is used to highlight the transformations in diagnostic practices occasioned by novel diagnostic instruments. In the second part of the paper, ethnographic accounts of contemporary anaesthesia are presented in order to sketch out the manifold variations of using diagnostic instruments in daily practice. Both cases are analysed on a micro-analytical level, emphasising the interrelations of bodies, tools and knowledge in concrete situations. The analysis shows how diagnostic instruments become embodied in the perceptual habits of physicians and how diagnosing becomes an ongoing activity in the course of managing an illness trajectory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)851-857
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Diagnosis
  • Germany
  • Phenomenology
  • Pragmatism
  • Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making sure: A comparative micro-analysis of diagnostic instruments in medical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this