Abstract
I will apply Ásta’s conferralist account of sex and gender to nationality, and distinguish two different ways in which nationality is conferred – by institutions, and in social interactions. I will then turn to the moral and political conflicts that arise where different understandings of nationality and different ways of conferring it overlap and collide. My main thesis is that these conflicts are never simply factual disputes about who and what belongs to a nation, they are always normative conflicts about who ought to belong. This, in turn, means that we cannot think about the ontology of nationality without thinking about what nationality ought to be, a conclusion that is well in line with the basic tenets of conferralism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-51 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Ontology |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Feb 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver