TY - JOUR
T1 - Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation
T2 - a phantom study
AU - Boers, T.
AU - Braak, S.J.
AU - Versluis, M.
AU - Manohar, S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Consumables were purchased from the Project Imaging Needles (Grant Number 116310008) Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)/the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Financial transaction number:
342132404
PY - 2021/7/29
Y1 - 2021/7/29
N2 - Background: Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound is well established for thyroid nodule assessment and treatment guidance. However, it is hampered by a limited field of view and observer variability that may lead to inaccurate nodule classification and treatment. To cope with these limitations, we investigated the use of real-time three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound to improve the accuracy of volume estimation and needle placement during radiofrequency ablation. We assess a new 3D matrix transducer for nodule volume estimation and image-guided radiofrequency ablation.Methods: Thirty thyroid nodule phantoms with thermochromic dye underwent volume estimation and ablation guided by a 2D linear and 3D mechanically-swept array and a 3D matrix transducer.Results: The 3D matrix nodule volume estimations had a lower median difference with the ground truth (0.4 mL) compared to the standard 2D approach (2.2 mL, p < 0.001) and mechanically swept 3D transducer (2.0 mL, p = 0.016). The 3D matrix-guided ablation resulted in a similar nodule ablation coverage when compared to 2D-guidance (76.7% versus 80.8%, p = 0.542). The 3D mechanically swept transducer performed worse (60.1%, p = 0.015). However, 3D matrix and 2D guidance ablations lead to a larger ablated volume outside the nodule than 3D mechanically swept (5.1 mL, 4.2 mL (p = 0.274), 0.5 mL (p < 0.001), respectively). The 3D matrix and mechanically swept approaches were faster with 80 and 72.5 s/mL ablated than 2D with 105.5 s/mL ablated.Conclusions: The 3D matrix transducer estimates volumes more accurately and can facilitate accurate needle placement while reducing procedure time.
AB - Background: Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound is well established for thyroid nodule assessment and treatment guidance. However, it is hampered by a limited field of view and observer variability that may lead to inaccurate nodule classification and treatment. To cope with these limitations, we investigated the use of real-time three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound to improve the accuracy of volume estimation and needle placement during radiofrequency ablation. We assess a new 3D matrix transducer for nodule volume estimation and image-guided radiofrequency ablation.Methods: Thirty thyroid nodule phantoms with thermochromic dye underwent volume estimation and ablation guided by a 2D linear and 3D mechanically-swept array and a 3D matrix transducer.Results: The 3D matrix nodule volume estimations had a lower median difference with the ground truth (0.4 mL) compared to the standard 2D approach (2.2 mL, p < 0.001) and mechanically swept 3D transducer (2.0 mL, p = 0.016). The 3D matrix-guided ablation resulted in a similar nodule ablation coverage when compared to 2D-guidance (76.7% versus 80.8%, p = 0.542). The 3D mechanically swept transducer performed worse (60.1%, p = 0.015). However, 3D matrix and 2D guidance ablations lead to a larger ablated volume outside the nodule than 3D mechanically swept (5.1 mL, 4.2 mL (p = 0.274), 0.5 mL (p < 0.001), respectively). The 3D matrix and mechanically swept approaches were faster with 80 and 72.5 s/mL ablated than 2D with 105.5 s/mL ablated.Conclusions: The 3D matrix transducer estimates volumes more accurately and can facilitate accurate needle placement while reducing procedure time.
KW - UT-Gold-D
KW - Phantoms (imaging)
KW - Radiofrequency ablation
KW - Thyroid nodule
KW - Ultrasonography
KW - Imaging (three-dimensional)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111480406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s41747-021-00230-4
DO - 10.1186/s41747-021-00230-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111480406
SN - 2509-9280
VL - 5
JO - European radiology experimental
JF - European radiology experimental
IS - 1
M1 - 31
ER -