Measurement of communication satisfaction. Evaluating the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire as a communication audit tool

Karen H. Zwijze-Koning, Menno D.T. de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
255 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite the number of publications about auditing organizational communication, scholars have paid little attention to the reliability and validity of individual audit techniques. This study examines the merits and restrictions of the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) by comparing CSQ results with results gathered with the critical incident technique. The authors used both instruments to assess the quality of internal communication within three organizations. They found that the two techniques converge and that the CSQ appears to have criterion-related validity. However, the CSQ fails to explicitly address issues of decision making, top-down and bottom-up communication, responsibilities, and the extent to which organizations keep rules and agreements. The authors conclude that the CSQ is an appropriate instrument for gaining overall insights into the way employees evaluate aspects of organizational communication but that the method is less suitable for diagnosing specific communication problems and formulating recommendations.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)261-282
Number of pages22
JournalManagement communication quarterly
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Keywords

  • IR-60064
  • Validity
  • METIS-243575
  • Critical incident technique
  • Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire
  • communication audit

Cite this

@article{91f93d5495504e969b75885b229a52d8,
title = "Measurement of communication satisfaction. Evaluating the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire as a communication audit tool",
abstract = "Despite the number of publications about auditing organizational communication, scholars have paid little attention to the reliability and validity of individual audit techniques. This study examines the merits and restrictions of the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) by comparing CSQ results with results gathered with the critical incident technique. The authors used both instruments to assess the quality of internal communication within three organizations. They found that the two techniques converge and that the CSQ appears to have criterion-related validity. However, the CSQ fails to explicitly address issues of decision making, top-down and bottom-up communication, responsibilities, and the extent to which organizations keep rules and agreements. The authors conclude that the CSQ is an appropriate instrument for gaining overall insights into the way employees evaluate aspects of organizational communication but that the method is less suitable for diagnosing specific communication problems and formulating recommendations.",
keywords = "IR-60064, Validity, METIS-243575, Critical incident technique, Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire, communication audit",
author = "Zwijze-Koning, {Karen H.} and {de Jong}, {Menno D.T.}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1177/0893318906295680",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "20",
pages = "261--282",
journal = "Management communication quarterly",
issn = "0893-3189",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

Measurement of communication satisfaction. Evaluating the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire as a communication audit tool. / Zwijze-Koning, Karen H.; de Jong, Menno D.T.

In: Management communication quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2007, p. 261-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of communication satisfaction. Evaluating the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire as a communication audit tool

AU - Zwijze-Koning, Karen H.

AU - de Jong, Menno D.T.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Despite the number of publications about auditing organizational communication, scholars have paid little attention to the reliability and validity of individual audit techniques. This study examines the merits and restrictions of the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) by comparing CSQ results with results gathered with the critical incident technique. The authors used both instruments to assess the quality of internal communication within three organizations. They found that the two techniques converge and that the CSQ appears to have criterion-related validity. However, the CSQ fails to explicitly address issues of decision making, top-down and bottom-up communication, responsibilities, and the extent to which organizations keep rules and agreements. The authors conclude that the CSQ is an appropriate instrument for gaining overall insights into the way employees evaluate aspects of organizational communication but that the method is less suitable for diagnosing specific communication problems and formulating recommendations.

AB - Despite the number of publications about auditing organizational communication, scholars have paid little attention to the reliability and validity of individual audit techniques. This study examines the merits and restrictions of the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) by comparing CSQ results with results gathered with the critical incident technique. The authors used both instruments to assess the quality of internal communication within three organizations. They found that the two techniques converge and that the CSQ appears to have criterion-related validity. However, the CSQ fails to explicitly address issues of decision making, top-down and bottom-up communication, responsibilities, and the extent to which organizations keep rules and agreements. The authors conclude that the CSQ is an appropriate instrument for gaining overall insights into the way employees evaluate aspects of organizational communication but that the method is less suitable for diagnosing specific communication problems and formulating recommendations.

KW - IR-60064

KW - Validity

KW - METIS-243575

KW - Critical incident technique

KW - Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire

KW - communication audit

U2 - 10.1177/0893318906295680

DO - 10.1177/0893318906295680

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 261

EP - 282

JO - Management communication quarterly

JF - Management communication quarterly

SN - 0893-3189

IS - 3

ER -