Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is recommended by peri-operative core outcome sets as a measure of disability. Despite its growing use, the effect of different surgical procedures on disability measured by WHODAS 2.0 remains poorly understood and heterogeneous reporting across studies limits direct comparison. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to assess the effect of different surgical procedures on disability measured by WHODAS 2.0, and the reporting of disability endpoints in peri-operative medicine. The primary outcome was the difference in WHODAS 2.0 summary score before and after surgery. Disability scores were calculated as a metric between 0% (no disability) and 100% (complete disability). Results: Thirty-nine studies were included. Pre-operative disability ranged from 2% to 61%. In 21 studies, disability increased by 1% to 17% within 3 months of surgery, with little change between 6 and 12 months (0% to -2%). Studies of orthopaedic surgery generally reported high pre-operative disability (> 35%) but also reductions in disability (10–37% reduction) within 3 months of surgery. In contrast, studies evaluating cancer surgery (n = 12) generally reported lower pre-operative disability (< 20%) but small increases (1–8%) within 3 months of surgery. Cardiovascular surgical studies displayed pre-operative disability between 4% and 17% with a difference in disability of -8% to +3% 3 months after surgery. Three different thresholds to define disability and 13 different WHODAS 2.0 endpoints were used, measured at eight different time-points after surgery. Discussion: The effect of surgical procedures on postoperative disability as measured by WHODAS 2.0 is influenced by the type of surgery. Orthopaedic surgery may decrease disability, whereas cancer surgery may be associated with persistent increases. Standardised reporting of disability endpoints is needed to enhance the quality and comparability of future studies using WHODAS 2.0.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Anaesthesia |
| Early online date | 24 Jul 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print/First online - 24 Jul 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- disability
- patient-reported outcome measure
- peri-operative medicine
- WHODAS 2.0
- World Health Organization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring patient disability in the peri-operative period using the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver