Abstract
Traditional optimization models assume a central decision maker who optimizes a global system performance measure. However, problem data is often distributed among several agents, and agents make autonomous decisions. This gives incentives for strategic behavior of agents, possibly leading to sub-optimal system performance. Furthermore, in dynamic environments, machines are locally dispersed and administratively independent. Examples are found both in business and engineering applications. We investigate such issues for a parallel machine scheduling model where jobs arrive online over time. Instead of centrally assigning jobs to machines, each machine implements a local sequencing rule and jobs decide for machines themselves. In this context, we introduce the concept of a myopic best response equilibrium, a concept weaker than the classical dominant strategy equilibrium, but appropriate for online problems. Our main result is a polynomial time, online mechanism that -assuming rational behavior of jobs- results in an equilibrium schedule that is 3.281-competitive with respect to the maximal social welfare. This is only slightly worse than state-of-the-art algorithms with central coordination.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 445-457 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Operations research |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Competitive equilibrium
- Total weighted completion time
- Mechanism design
- Decentralization
- Online machine scheduling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanism design for decentralized online machine scheduling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver