TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanism Design for Fair and Efficient DSO Flexibility Markets
AU - Tsaousoglou, Georgios
AU - Giraldo, Juan S.
AU - Pinson, Pierre
AU - Paterakis, Nikolaos G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received May 28, 2020; revised September 25, 2020 and November 30, 2020; accepted December 26, 2020. Date of publication January 1, 2021; date of current version April 21, 2021. The work of Georgios Tsaousoglou was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie under Agreement 754462. Paper no. TSG-00817-2020. (Corresponding author: Georgios Tsaousoglou.) Georgios Tsaousoglou, Juan S. Giraldo, and Nikolaos G. Paterakis are with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]).
Funding Information:
The work of Georgios Tsaousoglou was supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sk?odowska- Curie under Agreement 754462. Paper no. TSG-00817-2020.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2010-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - The proliferation of distributed energy assets necessitates the provision of flexibility to efficiently operate modern distribution systems. In this article, we propose a flexibility market through which the DSO may acquire flexibility services from asset aggregators in order to maintain network voltages and currents within safe limits. A max-min fair formulation is proposed for the allocation of flexibility. Since the DSO is not aware of each aggregator's local flexibility costs, we show that strategic misreporting can lead to severe loss of efficiency. Using mechanism design theory, we provide a mechanism that makes it a payoff-maximizing strategy for each aggregator to make truthful bids to the flexibility market. While typical truthful mechanisms only work when the objective is the maximization of Social Welfare, the proposed mechanism lets the DSO achieve incentive compatibility and optimality for the max-min fairness objective.
AB - The proliferation of distributed energy assets necessitates the provision of flexibility to efficiently operate modern distribution systems. In this article, we propose a flexibility market through which the DSO may acquire flexibility services from asset aggregators in order to maintain network voltages and currents within safe limits. A max-min fair formulation is proposed for the allocation of flexibility. Since the DSO is not aware of each aggregator's local flexibility costs, we show that strategic misreporting can lead to severe loss of efficiency. Using mechanism design theory, we provide a mechanism that makes it a payoff-maximizing strategy for each aggregator to make truthful bids to the flexibility market. While typical truthful mechanisms only work when the objective is the maximization of Social Welfare, the proposed mechanism lets the DSO achieve incentive compatibility and optimality for the max-min fairness objective.
KW - aggregator
KW - distribution system
KW - fairness
KW - Flexibility
KW - incentive compatibility
KW - mechanism design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099095786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TSG.2020.3048738
DO - 10.1109/TSG.2020.3048738
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099095786
SN - 1949-3053
VL - 12
SP - 2249
EP - 2260
JO - IEEE transactions on smart grid
JF - IEEE transactions on smart grid
IS - 3
M1 - 9312120
ER -