Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology

R.J. Rienks

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UTAcademic

63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Meetings are often inefficiënt. They are numerous and unavoidable. If we look at the technological developments in this area we quickly see that along with the introduction of the microphone and the data projector, the execution of a meeting for the participants has become much easier. Yet there are still many aspects of a meeting that can be improved, where technology in its current stage has not contributed much. There is for instance hardly any technology that is able to autonomously interpret, or analyze, aspects of the meeting process. An automatic analysis of a meeting could provide valuable insights for both the attendants, as well as for those interested parties who could not attend. These insights hypothetically could in turn lead again to more successful meeting processes. It is, for example, often the case that one or two dominant participants can monopolize a complete meeting in a way that they make it impossible for others to contribute. Another example is that the argumentation that has been put forward and that led to a certain decision is often forgotten and lost, not to mention that during a discussion just one line of argumentation can be in the center of attention. It is investigated to what extent the latest technological developments can provide automatic insights into both, so-called higher-level meeting phenomena. To enable the automatic recognition, a descriptive and computationally accessible model has been created for the phenomenon of dominance hierarchy as well as for argument structure. Whereas the model for a dominance hierarchy did not require more than a ranking of the participants, the model that describes the argumentation structure requires interpretation of the individual contributions, as well as the knowledge of how to label contributions in the context of the discussion.
Original languageUndefined
Awarding Institution
  • University of Twente
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Nijholt, Antinus , Supervisor
  • Heylen, Dirk K.J., Advisor
Thesis sponsors
Award date11 Jul 2007
Place of PublicationEnschede, the Netherlands
Publisher
Print ISBNs978-90-365-2533-6
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 2007

Keywords

  • EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP6/0033812
  • HMI-MI: MULTIMODAL INTERACTIONS
  • EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP6/506811
  • EWI-11022
  • IR-57887
  • METIS-241891

Cite this

Rienks, R. J. (2007). Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology. Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente.
Rienks, R.J.. / Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology. Enschede, the Netherlands : University of Twente, 2007. 201 p.
@phdthesis{eb902a1a4a3946c69338f1079df6d012,
title = "Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology",
abstract = "Meetings are often ineffici{\"e}nt. They are numerous and unavoidable. If we look at the technological developments in this area we quickly see that along with the introduction of the microphone and the data projector, the execution of a meeting for the participants has become much easier. Yet there are still many aspects of a meeting that can be improved, where technology in its current stage has not contributed much. There is for instance hardly any technology that is able to autonomously interpret, or analyze, aspects of the meeting process. An automatic analysis of a meeting could provide valuable insights for both the attendants, as well as for those interested parties who could not attend. These insights hypothetically could in turn lead again to more successful meeting processes. It is, for example, often the case that one or two dominant participants can monopolize a complete meeting in a way that they make it impossible for others to contribute. Another example is that the argumentation that has been put forward and that led to a certain decision is often forgotten and lost, not to mention that during a discussion just one line of argumentation can be in the center of attention. It is investigated to what extent the latest technological developments can provide automatic insights into both, so-called higher-level meeting phenomena. To enable the automatic recognition, a descriptive and computationally accessible model has been created for the phenomenon of dominance hierarchy as well as for argument structure. Whereas the model for a dominance hierarchy did not require more than a ranking of the participants, the model that describes the argumentation structure requires interpretation of the individual contributions, as well as the knowledge of how to label contributions in the context of the discussion.",
keywords = "EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP6/0033812, HMI-MI: MULTIMODAL INTERACTIONS, EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP6/506811, EWI-11022, IR-57887, METIS-241891",
author = "R.J. Rienks",
note = "ISSN 1381-3617, No. 07-100",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "11",
language = "Undefined",
isbn = "978-90-365-2533-6",
publisher = "University of Twente",
address = "Netherlands",
school = "University of Twente",

}

Rienks, RJ 2007, 'Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology', University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology. / Rienks, R.J.

Enschede, the Netherlands : University of Twente, 2007. 201 p.

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UTAcademic

TY - THES

T1 - Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology

AU - Rienks, R.J.

N1 - ISSN 1381-3617, No. 07-100

PY - 2007/7/11

Y1 - 2007/7/11

N2 - Meetings are often inefficiënt. They are numerous and unavoidable. If we look at the technological developments in this area we quickly see that along with the introduction of the microphone and the data projector, the execution of a meeting for the participants has become much easier. Yet there are still many aspects of a meeting that can be improved, where technology in its current stage has not contributed much. There is for instance hardly any technology that is able to autonomously interpret, or analyze, aspects of the meeting process. An automatic analysis of a meeting could provide valuable insights for both the attendants, as well as for those interested parties who could not attend. These insights hypothetically could in turn lead again to more successful meeting processes. It is, for example, often the case that one or two dominant participants can monopolize a complete meeting in a way that they make it impossible for others to contribute. Another example is that the argumentation that has been put forward and that led to a certain decision is often forgotten and lost, not to mention that during a discussion just one line of argumentation can be in the center of attention. It is investigated to what extent the latest technological developments can provide automatic insights into both, so-called higher-level meeting phenomena. To enable the automatic recognition, a descriptive and computationally accessible model has been created for the phenomenon of dominance hierarchy as well as for argument structure. Whereas the model for a dominance hierarchy did not require more than a ranking of the participants, the model that describes the argumentation structure requires interpretation of the individual contributions, as well as the knowledge of how to label contributions in the context of the discussion.

AB - Meetings are often inefficiënt. They are numerous and unavoidable. If we look at the technological developments in this area we quickly see that along with the introduction of the microphone and the data projector, the execution of a meeting for the participants has become much easier. Yet there are still many aspects of a meeting that can be improved, where technology in its current stage has not contributed much. There is for instance hardly any technology that is able to autonomously interpret, or analyze, aspects of the meeting process. An automatic analysis of a meeting could provide valuable insights for both the attendants, as well as for those interested parties who could not attend. These insights hypothetically could in turn lead again to more successful meeting processes. It is, for example, often the case that one or two dominant participants can monopolize a complete meeting in a way that they make it impossible for others to contribute. Another example is that the argumentation that has been put forward and that led to a certain decision is often forgotten and lost, not to mention that during a discussion just one line of argumentation can be in the center of attention. It is investigated to what extent the latest technological developments can provide automatic insights into both, so-called higher-level meeting phenomena. To enable the automatic recognition, a descriptive and computationally accessible model has been created for the phenomenon of dominance hierarchy as well as for argument structure. Whereas the model for a dominance hierarchy did not require more than a ranking of the participants, the model that describes the argumentation structure requires interpretation of the individual contributions, as well as the knowledge of how to label contributions in the context of the discussion.

KW - EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP6/0033812

KW - HMI-MI: MULTIMODAL INTERACTIONS

KW - EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP6/506811

KW - EWI-11022

KW - IR-57887

KW - METIS-241891

M3 - PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

SN - 978-90-365-2533-6

PB - University of Twente

CY - Enschede, the Netherlands

ER -

Rienks RJ. Meetings in smart environments. Implications of progressing technology. Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente, 2007. 201 p.