Mens of geen mens? Een filosofie van de posthuman

Theo Wobbes

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research external, graduation UT

67 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study investigates the relation between the human and the posthuman. Human enhancement technologies have made it possible for human beings to redesign themselves which might result in alterations that take the human being beyond itself, toward a ‘posthuman’ being. To what extent can this posthuman, defined as the self-designed successor of the current human being, still be considered a human? And how to explain that an organism originating from nature comes to the idea to take its own evolution in hands?
The study builds on and expands philosophical-anthropological analyses of what it means to be human on the theory of the German philosopher and zoologist Helmuth Plessner. Two lines of developments are analyzed: one ‘biological’, the other ‘transcendental’. The biological line takes an evolutionary perspective. The other has a transcendental nature, and refers to the relationship human beings have with their biological body. Plessner’s work has a special place here because he thinks the body from a third-person perspective: the ‘eccentric positionality’. Based on that, he makes a distinction between the physical or biological body, Körper (the body that we ‘have’), and the lived body, Leib (the body that we are’). From this transcendental perspective, the question of the relation between the human and the posthuman takes the shape of studying the effects of manipulating the physical body on the lived body, and on the social functioning of the person who is simultaneously aware of her physical and her lived body. The physical body is in fact a function of the lived body and that both have a functional relationship with the shared world. This means that changes in the one may have consequences for the other.
On basis of that which has come forward out of this study, the conclusion is that it in fact belongs to the human being to change himself continuously. After all, it is an essential human characteristic to pursue the new in order to satisfy desires and needs. Also as posthuman, we will still be human.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • University of Twente
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Verbeek, Peter-Paul C.C., Supervisor
  • Aydin, Ciano , Supervisor
Award date10 Oct 2019
Place of PublicationEnschede
Publisher
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Human Being
Lived Body
Transcendental
Nature
Physical Body
Physical
Person
Successor
Positionality
Organism
Alteration
German philosopher
Evolutionary
Human Enhancement

Cite this

Wobbes, Theo. / Mens of geen mens? Een filosofie van de posthuman. Enschede : University of Twente, 2019. 251 p.
@phdthesis{da54f81969f644d5b818099f233a94c3,
title = "Mens of geen mens?: Een filosofie van de posthuman",
abstract = "This study investigates the relation between the human and the posthuman. Human enhancement technologies have made it possible for human beings to redesign themselves which might result in alterations that take the human being beyond itself, toward a ‘posthuman’ being. To what extent can this posthuman, defined as the self-designed successor of the current human being, still be considered a human? And how to explain that an organism originating from nature comes to the idea to take its own evolution in hands? The study builds on and expands philosophical-anthropological analyses of what it means to be human on the theory of the German philosopher and zoologist Helmuth Plessner. Two lines of developments are analyzed: one ‘biological’, the other ‘transcendental’. The biological line takes an evolutionary perspective. The other has a transcendental nature, and refers to the relationship human beings have with their biological body. Plessner’s work has a special place here because he thinks the body from a third-person perspective: the ‘eccentric positionality’. Based on that, he makes a distinction between the physical or biological body, K{\"o}rper (the body that we ‘have’), and the lived body, Leib (the body that we are’). From this transcendental perspective, the question of the relation between the human and the posthuman takes the shape of studying the effects of manipulating the physical body on the lived body, and on the social functioning of the person who is simultaneously aware of her physical and her lived body. The physical body is in fact a function of the lived body and that both have a functional relationship with the shared world. This means that changes in the one may have consequences for the other. On basis of that which has come forward out of this study, the conclusion is that it in fact belongs to the human being to change himself continuously. After all, it is an essential human characteristic to pursue the new in order to satisfy desires and needs. Also as posthuman, we will still be human.",
author = "Theo Wobbes",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "10",
doi = "10.3990/1.9789402817171",
language = "English",
publisher = "University of Twente",
address = "Netherlands",
school = "University of Twente",

}

Wobbes, T 2019, 'Mens of geen mens? Een filosofie van de posthuman', Doctor of Philosophy, University of Twente, Enschede. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789402817171

Mens of geen mens? Een filosofie van de posthuman. / Wobbes, Theo.

Enschede : University of Twente, 2019. 251 p.

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research external, graduation UT

TY - THES

T1 - Mens of geen mens?

T2 - Een filosofie van de posthuman

AU - Wobbes, Theo

PY - 2019/10/10

Y1 - 2019/10/10

N2 - This study investigates the relation between the human and the posthuman. Human enhancement technologies have made it possible for human beings to redesign themselves which might result in alterations that take the human being beyond itself, toward a ‘posthuman’ being. To what extent can this posthuman, defined as the self-designed successor of the current human being, still be considered a human? And how to explain that an organism originating from nature comes to the idea to take its own evolution in hands? The study builds on and expands philosophical-anthropological analyses of what it means to be human on the theory of the German philosopher and zoologist Helmuth Plessner. Two lines of developments are analyzed: one ‘biological’, the other ‘transcendental’. The biological line takes an evolutionary perspective. The other has a transcendental nature, and refers to the relationship human beings have with their biological body. Plessner’s work has a special place here because he thinks the body from a third-person perspective: the ‘eccentric positionality’. Based on that, he makes a distinction between the physical or biological body, Körper (the body that we ‘have’), and the lived body, Leib (the body that we are’). From this transcendental perspective, the question of the relation between the human and the posthuman takes the shape of studying the effects of manipulating the physical body on the lived body, and on the social functioning of the person who is simultaneously aware of her physical and her lived body. The physical body is in fact a function of the lived body and that both have a functional relationship with the shared world. This means that changes in the one may have consequences for the other. On basis of that which has come forward out of this study, the conclusion is that it in fact belongs to the human being to change himself continuously. After all, it is an essential human characteristic to pursue the new in order to satisfy desires and needs. Also as posthuman, we will still be human.

AB - This study investigates the relation between the human and the posthuman. Human enhancement technologies have made it possible for human beings to redesign themselves which might result in alterations that take the human being beyond itself, toward a ‘posthuman’ being. To what extent can this posthuman, defined as the self-designed successor of the current human being, still be considered a human? And how to explain that an organism originating from nature comes to the idea to take its own evolution in hands? The study builds on and expands philosophical-anthropological analyses of what it means to be human on the theory of the German philosopher and zoologist Helmuth Plessner. Two lines of developments are analyzed: one ‘biological’, the other ‘transcendental’. The biological line takes an evolutionary perspective. The other has a transcendental nature, and refers to the relationship human beings have with their biological body. Plessner’s work has a special place here because he thinks the body from a third-person perspective: the ‘eccentric positionality’. Based on that, he makes a distinction between the physical or biological body, Körper (the body that we ‘have’), and the lived body, Leib (the body that we are’). From this transcendental perspective, the question of the relation between the human and the posthuman takes the shape of studying the effects of manipulating the physical body on the lived body, and on the social functioning of the person who is simultaneously aware of her physical and her lived body. The physical body is in fact a function of the lived body and that both have a functional relationship with the shared world. This means that changes in the one may have consequences for the other. On basis of that which has come forward out of this study, the conclusion is that it in fact belongs to the human being to change himself continuously. After all, it is an essential human characteristic to pursue the new in order to satisfy desires and needs. Also as posthuman, we will still be human.

U2 - 10.3990/1.9789402817171

DO - 10.3990/1.9789402817171

M3 - PhD Thesis - Research external, graduation UT

PB - University of Twente

CY - Enschede

ER -