TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the effect of processing parameters on temperature history in Directed Energy Deposition
T2 - an analytical and finite element approach
AU - Ghasempour-Mouziraji, Mehran
AU - Afonso, Daniel
AU - Hosseinzadeh, Saman
AU - Goulas, Constantinos
AU - Najafizadeh, Mojtaba
AU - Hosseinzadeh, Morteza
AU - Ganji, D. D.
AU - Alves de Sousa, Ricardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2024/2/7
Y1 - 2024/2/7
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of analytical models, specifically the radial basis function method, Akbari–Ganji method and Gaussian method, in conjunction with the finite element method. The aim is to examine the impact of processing parameters on temperature history. Design/methodology/approach: Through analytical investigation and finite element simulation, this research examines the influence of processing parameters on temperature history. Simufact software with a thermomechanical approach was used for finite element simulation, while radial basis function, Akbari–Ganji and Gaussian methods were used for analytical modeling to solve the heat transfer differential equation. Findings: The accuracy of both finite element and analytical methods was validated with about 90%. The findings revealed direct relationships between thermal conductivity (from 100 to 200), laser power (from 400 to 800 W), heat source depth (from 0.35 to 0.75) and power absorption coefficient (from 0.4 to 0.8). Increasing the values of these parameters led to higher temperature history. On the other hand, density (from 7,600 to 8,200), emission coefficient (from 0.5 to 0.7) and convective heat transfer (from 35 to 90) exhibited an inverse relationship with temperature history. Originality/value: The application of analytical modeling, particularly the utilization of the Akbari–Ganji, radial basis functions and Gaussian methods, showcases an innovative approach to studying directed energy deposition. This analytical investigation offers an alternative to relying solely on experimental procedures, potentially saving time and resources in the optimization of DED processes.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of analytical models, specifically the radial basis function method, Akbari–Ganji method and Gaussian method, in conjunction with the finite element method. The aim is to examine the impact of processing parameters on temperature history. Design/methodology/approach: Through analytical investigation and finite element simulation, this research examines the influence of processing parameters on temperature history. Simufact software with a thermomechanical approach was used for finite element simulation, while radial basis function, Akbari–Ganji and Gaussian methods were used for analytical modeling to solve the heat transfer differential equation. Findings: The accuracy of both finite element and analytical methods was validated with about 90%. The findings revealed direct relationships between thermal conductivity (from 100 to 200), laser power (from 400 to 800 W), heat source depth (from 0.35 to 0.75) and power absorption coefficient (from 0.4 to 0.8). Increasing the values of these parameters led to higher temperature history. On the other hand, density (from 7,600 to 8,200), emission coefficient (from 0.5 to 0.7) and convective heat transfer (from 35 to 90) exhibited an inverse relationship with temperature history. Originality/value: The application of analytical modeling, particularly the utilization of the Akbari–Ganji, radial basis functions and Gaussian methods, showcases an innovative approach to studying directed energy deposition. This analytical investigation offers an alternative to relying solely on experimental procedures, potentially saving time and resources in the optimization of DED processes.
KW - NLA
KW - Directed energy deposition
KW - Finite element simulation
KW - Radial basis functions method
KW - Akbari–Ganji method
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85179952949
U2 - 10.1108/RPJ-05-2023-0165
DO - 10.1108/RPJ-05-2023-0165
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85179952949
SN - 1355-2546
VL - 30
SP - 338
EP - 349
JO - Rapid prototyping journal
JF - Rapid prototyping journal
IS - 2
ER -