Moderation of Policy-Making? Science and Technology Policy Evaluation Beyond Impact Measurement—the Case of Germany

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In the field of science and technology policies, for the most part, evaluation procedures are utilized as a way of measuring the scientific and technological quality or the socio-economic impacts of publicly funded research. Beyond this practice, could evaluation procedures be used as a medium for the 'moderation' of struggles, controversies and negotiations in the science and technology policy arena? The present article addresses this question using the German evaluation practice—moulded by a relatively high degree of institutional differentiation and autonomy of the major policy actors—as a background. After some theoretical considerations, a case study is presented illustrating the ‘moderation approach’: a multi-annual monitoring evaluation of eight newly created, publicly funded interdisciplinary clinical research centres at German university hospitals.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)130-148
    Number of pages19
    JournalEvaluation
    Volume4
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1998

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Moderation of Policy-Making? Science and Technology Policy Evaluation Beyond Impact Measurement—the Case of Germany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this