Monitoring migrants or making migrants ‘misfit’? Data protection and human rights perspectives on Dutch identity management practices regarding migrants

Karolina La Fors-Owczynik*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Record numbers of migrants and refugees fleeing violence and poverty in parts of Africa and the Middle East present the European Union with unprecedented challenges, including in determining their identity. In recent years problems of identifying immigrants have been addressed in order to fight identity fraud and illegal entry. As a result, a wide variety of digital systems have been introduced to orchestrate an effective, preventative modus of identification of migrants, including to select those who (are about to) commit identity fraud or who enter EU territory illegally. Although the key aim of the digital systems is framed to protect the geographic and legal borders of member states and the safety of their population, empirically based studies demonstrate that these systems bring new risks for migrants. Against the background of many migrants finding themselves at risk in their home country and of the two legislative frameworks mentioned above, this article addresses first, how migrants are perceived by digital monitoring practices: are they themselves at risk, non-risk or do they pose a risk? In the EU, migrants must prove that their case is worthy of asylum status because they are ‘at risk’ from political unrest or other life-threatening circumstances in their home country. Yet, empirical data gathered through semi-structured interviews show that simply abiding by the standards during an enrolment process of the INS console, rather than being ‘at risk’, a migrant can easily be categorised as ‘posing a risk’ (La Fors-Owczynik & Van der Ploeg, 2015). Second, this article investigates the capacity of the new data protection regime in protecting migrants from being framed as a ‘misfit’. Given this second aim, the discussion explores how the European Convention on Human Rights can provide additional legal remedy for migrants being digitally categorised in a manner that is detrimental to them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-449
Number of pages17
JournalComputer law & security review
Volume32
Issue number3
Early online date23 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring migrants or making migrants ‘misfit’? Data protection and human rights perspectives on Dutch identity management practices regarding migrants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this