Mono, bi- and tri-exponential diffusion MRI modelling for renal solid masses and comparison with histopathological findings

Sophie van Baalen (Corresponding Author), Martijn Froeling, Marino Asselman, Caroline Klazen, Claire Jeltes, Lotte van Dijk, Bart Vroling, Pieter Dik, Bennie Ten Haken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and tri-exponential models of the diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal for the characterization of renal lesions in relationship to histopathological findings. METHODS: Sixteen patients planned to undergo nephrectomy for kidney tumour were scanned before surgery at 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with T2-weighted imaging, DTI and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) using ten b-values. DTI parameters (mean diffusivity [MD] and fractional anisotropy [FA]) were obtained by iterative weighted linear least squared fitting of the DTI data and bi-, and tri-exponential fit parameters (Dbi, fstar,and Dtri, ffast,finterm) using a nonlinear fit of the multiple b-value DWI data. Average parameters were calculated for regions of interest, selecting the lesions and healthy kidney tissue. Tumour type and specificities were determined after surgery by histological examination. Mean parameter values of healthy tissue and solid lesions were compared using a Wilcoxon-signed ranked test and MANOVA. RESULTS: Thirteen solid lesions (nine clear cell carcinomas, two papillary renal cell carcinoma, one haemangioma and one oncocytoma) and four cysts were included. The mean MD of solid lesions are significantly (p < 0.05) lower than healthy cortex and medulla, (1.94 ± 0.32*10- 3 mm2/s versus 2.16 ± 0.12*10- 3 mm2/s and 2.21 ± 0.14*10- 3 mm2/s, respectively) whereas ffast is significantly higher (7.30 ± 3.29% versus 4.14 ± 1.92% and 4.57 ± 1.74%) and finterm is significantly lower (18.7 ± 5.02% versus 28.8 ± 5.09% and 26.4 ± 6.65%). Diffusion coefficients were high (≥2.0*10- 3 mm2/s for MD, 1.90*10- 3 mm2/s for Dbi and 1.6*10- 3 mm2/s for Dtri) in cc-RCCs with cystic structures and/or haemorrhaging and low (≤1.80*10- 3 mm2/s for MD, 1.40*10- 3 mm2/s for Dbi and 1.05*10- 3 mm2/s for Dtri) in tumours with necrosis or sarcomatoid differentiation. CONCLUSION: Parameters derived from a two- or three-component fit of the diffusion signal are sensitive to histopathological features of kidney lesions.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society
Volume18
Issue number44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Diffusion tensor imaging
  • Kidney neoplasms
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mono, bi- and tri-exponential diffusion MRI modelling for renal solid masses and comparison with histopathological findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this