Abstract
There might not be a specific nano-ethics, but there definitely is an ethics of new & emerging science and technology (NEST), with characteristic tropes and patterns of moral argumentation. Ethical discussion in and around nanoscience and technology reflects such NEST-ethics. We offer an inventory of the arguments, and show patterns in their evolution, in arenas full of proponents and opponents. We also show that there are some nano-specific issues: in how size matters, and when agency is delegated to smart devices. Our overall approach is a pragmatist ethics, and we conclude that struggle (and learning) might be more productive than models emphasizing consensus.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-20 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | NanoEthics |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- New & emerging science and technology
- Moral argumentation
- Consequentialism
- Opponents
- Good life
- Ethics
- Ambivalences
- Arena model