Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualised

Anne M. Dijkstra, Christine R. Critchley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)


    Understanding public perceptions of and attitudes to nanotechnology is important in order to understand and facilitate processes of dialogue and public participation. This research quantitatively analysed risk perceptions and attitudes of Dutch science café participants (n = 233) and compared these with members of the Dutch public (n = 378) who had not attended a café but were interested in science and technology as well. A qualitative analysis of the meetings contextualised and enriched the quantitative findings. Both groups shared similar key attitudes and were positive about nanotechnology while the Dutch café participants were even more positive about nanotechnology than the group of non-participants. The perception that nanotechnology would lead to risk applications was only predictive of attitudes for the non-participants. The qualitative analysis showed that café participants and speakers considered discussion of the risks, benefits and related issues important. Further research could investigate how science cafés can play a role in the science–society debate
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)71-87
    JournalPublic understanding of science
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2016


    • METIS-306981
    • IR-93052


    Dive into the research topics of 'Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualised'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this