Natural environment and childhood obesity: A systematic review

Peng Jia*, Shaoqing Dai, Kristen E. Rohli, Robert V. Rohli, Yanan Ma, Chao Yu, Xiongfeng Pan, Weiqi Zhou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
120 Downloads (Pure)


The associations between built and food environments and childhood obesity have been studied extensively. However, the association between the natural environment and childhood obesity has received too little scholarly attention. This study reviewed the literature published before 1 January 2019, which described associations between a full range of natural environmental factors (e.g., rainfall, temperature, sunlight, natural disasters, flood and drought) and weight‐related behaviours and childhood obesity. Five cross‐sectional studies and one longitudinal study were identified. Measures of natural environmental factors varied across six included studies, falling into five broad categories: weather conditions, altitude, natural disaster risk, air quality and day length. It was found that temperature was a significant weather indicator in most included studies and was associated with a reduction of daily physical activity. Children living in high‐altitude areas were more likely to be shorter and heavier than their counterparts in low‐altitude areas. Findings of this study will contribute to helping multiple stakeholders, including policy makers and urban planners, and formulate health policies and interventions to mitigate the detrimental impact of the natural environment on childhood obesity. More longitudinal studies should be designed to confirm these effects and explore the potential health effects of more natural environmental factors.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13097
Number of pages9
JournalObesity reviews
Issue numberS1
Early online date1 Sept 2020
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2021


  • UT-Hybrid-D


Dive into the research topics of 'Natural environment and childhood obesity: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this