TY - JOUR
T1 - Nature's disvalues
T2 - what are they and why do they matter?
AU - Lliso, Bosco
AU - Lenzi, Dominic
AU - Muraca, Barbara
AU - Chan, Kai MA
AU - Pascual, Unai
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. B.L. and U.P. are supported by the Spanish State Research Agency through María de Maeztu Excellence Unit accreditation 2018–2022 (Ref. MDM-2017-0714 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - This paper expands the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) values framing about nature and its contributions to people by exploring the notion of ‘disvalues’, which pertains to aspects of nature that reduce well being (instrumental disvalues), relationships that are detrimental to a dignified and flourishing life (relational disvalues), or the perception of badness in an absolute sense, regardless of the impact on people (intrinsic disvalues). Shedding light on how people express disvalues helps to better capture their preferences and subjective perspectives, as well as account for the socioenvironmental positions from which they speak. Considering the full spectrum of disvalues opens up new ways to better identify social–ecological trade-offs, a necessary step for seeking solutions and finding common ground on sustainability and justice.
AB - This paper expands the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) values framing about nature and its contributions to people by exploring the notion of ‘disvalues’, which pertains to aspects of nature that reduce well being (instrumental disvalues), relationships that are detrimental to a dignified and flourishing life (relational disvalues), or the perception of badness in an absolute sense, regardless of the impact on people (intrinsic disvalues). Shedding light on how people express disvalues helps to better capture their preferences and subjective perspectives, as well as account for the socioenvironmental positions from which they speak. Considering the full spectrum of disvalues opens up new ways to better identify social–ecological trade-offs, a necessary step for seeking solutions and finding common ground on sustainability and justice.
KW - 22/3 OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128133260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101173
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101173
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128133260
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 56
JO - Current opinion in environmental sustainability
JF - Current opinion in environmental sustainability
M1 - 101173
ER -