TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural correlates of intentional communication
AU - Noordzij, Matthijs Leendert
AU - Newman-Norlund, Sarah E.
AU - de Ruiter, Jan Peter
AU - Hagoort, Peter
AU - Levinson, Stephen C.
AU - Toni, Ivan
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - We know a great deal about the neurophysiological mechanisms supporting instrumental actions, i.e., actions designed to alter the physical state of the environment. In contrast, little is known about our ability to select communicative actions, i.e., actions directly designed to modify the mental state of another agent. We have recently provided novel empirical evidence for a mechanism in which a communicator selects his actions on the basis of a prediction of the communicative intentions that an addressee is most likely to attribute to those actions. The main novelty of those findings was that this prediction of intention recognition is cerebrally implemented within the intention recognition system of the communicator, is modulated by the ambiguity in meaning of the communicative acts, and not by their sensorimotor complexity. The characteristics of this predictive mechanism support the notion that human communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor and linguistic processes
AB - We know a great deal about the neurophysiological mechanisms supporting instrumental actions, i.e., actions designed to alter the physical state of the environment. In contrast, little is known about our ability to select communicative actions, i.e., actions directly designed to modify the mental state of another agent. We have recently provided novel empirical evidence for a mechanism in which a communicator selects his actions on the basis of a prediction of the communicative intentions that an addressee is most likely to attribute to those actions. The main novelty of those findings was that this prediction of intention recognition is cerebrally implemented within the intention recognition system of the communicator, is modulated by the ambiguity in meaning of the communicative acts, and not by their sensorimotor complexity. The characteristics of this predictive mechanism support the notion that human communicative abilities are distinct from both sensorimotor and linguistic processes
KW - Joint action
KW - fMRI
KW - Intention recognition
KW - FP6/003747
U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2010.00188
DO - 10.3389/fnins.2010.00188
M3 - Article
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 4
JO - Frontiers in human neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in human neuroscience
IS - 188
M1 - 188
ER -