TY - JOUR
T1 - Neurophysiological signatures reflect differences in visual attention during absence seizures
AU - Barone, Valentina
AU - Piastra, Maria Carla
AU - van Dijk, Johannes P.
AU - Visser, Gerhard H.
AU - Debeij-van Hall, Mariette H.J.A.
AU - van Putten, Michel J.A.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Patients’ inclusion was possible thanks to Inge van der Linden and William Smit from the department of Clinical Neurophysiology at Kempenhaeghe, and the precious work of the staff members of the EMU. Also, we would like to acknowledge the valuable help of Robert Helling and the staff members of the EMU at SEIN Heemstede. We thank Prejaas K. Baldewpersad Tewarie for his help and suggestions for our data analysis. We acknowledge the assistance of Robert Oostenveld and the EEGLAB team during the development of our dipole fitting analysis. We are not allowed to share patients’ data. The code of the visual attention task is publicly available at: https://github.com/Valeebarons/Visual_attention_task. The code of data analyzes for EEG and eye-tracking data is publicly available at: https://github.com/Valeebarons/Analyses_eyemovements_absences. Michel J.A.M. van Putten is a co-founder of Clinical Science Systems, a manufacturer of clinical EEG software. The remaining authors have no confiicts of interest. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Objective: Absences affect visual attention and eye movements variably. Here, we explore whether the dissimilarity of these symptoms during absences is reflected in differences in electroencephalographic (EEG) features, functional connectivity, and activation of the frontal eye field. Methods: Pediatric patients with absences performed a computerized choice reaction time task, with simultaneous recording of EEG and eye-tracking. We quantified visual attention and eye movements with reaction times, response correctness, and EEG features. Finally, we studied brain networks involved in the generation and propagation of seizures. Results: Ten pediatric patients had absences during the measurement. Five patients had preserved eye movements (preserved group) and five patients showed disrupted eye movements (unpreserved group) during seizures. Source reconstruction showed a stronger involvement of the right frontal eye field during absences in the unpreserved group than in the preserved group (dipole fraction 1.02% and 0.34%, respectively, p < 0.05). Graph analysis revealed different connection fractions of specific channels. Conclusions: The impairment of visual attention varies among patients with absences and is associated with differences in EEG features, network activation, and involvement of the right frontal eye field. Significance: Assessing the visual attention of patients with absences can be usefully employed in clinical practice for tailored advice to the individual patient.
AB - Objective: Absences affect visual attention and eye movements variably. Here, we explore whether the dissimilarity of these symptoms during absences is reflected in differences in electroencephalographic (EEG) features, functional connectivity, and activation of the frontal eye field. Methods: Pediatric patients with absences performed a computerized choice reaction time task, with simultaneous recording of EEG and eye-tracking. We quantified visual attention and eye movements with reaction times, response correctness, and EEG features. Finally, we studied brain networks involved in the generation and propagation of seizures. Results: Ten pediatric patients had absences during the measurement. Five patients had preserved eye movements (preserved group) and five patients showed disrupted eye movements (unpreserved group) during seizures. Source reconstruction showed a stronger involvement of the right frontal eye field during absences in the unpreserved group than in the preserved group (dipole fraction 1.02% and 0.34%, respectively, p < 0.05). Graph analysis revealed different connection fractions of specific channels. Conclusions: The impairment of visual attention varies among patients with absences and is associated with differences in EEG features, network activation, and involvement of the right frontal eye field. Significance: Assessing the visual attention of patients with absences can be usefully employed in clinical practice for tailored advice to the individual patient.
KW - Absence epilepsy
KW - Absence seizures
KW - EEG
KW - Eye tracking
KW - Frontal eye field
KW - Visual attention
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160999532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.05.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 37269771
AN - SCOPUS:85160999532
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 152
SP - 34
EP - 42
JO - Clinical neurophysiology
JF - Clinical neurophysiology
ER -