Noise annoyance caused by continuous descent approaches compared to regular descent procedures

Kim White, Michael Arntzen, Francesco Walker, Fredrick M. Waiyaki, Martijn Meeter, Adelbert Bronkhorst

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    During Continuous Descent Approaches (CDAs) aircraft glide towards the runway resulting in reduced noise and fuel usage. Here, we investigated whether such landings cause less noise annoyance than a regular stepwise approach. Both landing types were compared in a controlled laboratory setting with a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS), using four audio samples: an overflight during a regular approach (2000 ft altitude) and three aircraft performing CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000 ft. The samples at 2000 ft and 4000 ft were recorded at a countryside road, a 360° photo of which was used for the virtual visuals. The other two CDA samples were derived from the recording at 4000 ft. Participants were asked to rate all flyover samples twice while being immersed in the virtual environment. The CDA at 3000 ft was rated as most annoying, likely due to a longer overflight duration, followed by the regular descent and then the CDAs at 4000 and 5000 ft. As CDAs follow a fairly steady trajectory, it was estimated that they will increase annoyance within an area of approximately 2.5 km2, as compared to regular landings. Outside of this area, CDAs may instead result in less annoyance than regular landings.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)194-198
    Number of pages5
    JournalApplied acoustics
    Volume125
    Issue numberOctober
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    descent
    landing
    aircraft
    runways
    roads
    simulators
    recording
    trajectories
    causes

    Cite this

    White, Kim ; Arntzen, Michael ; Walker, Francesco ; Waiyaki, Fredrick M. ; Meeter, Martijn ; Bronkhorst, Adelbert. / Noise annoyance caused by continuous descent approaches compared to regular descent procedures. In: Applied acoustics. 2017 ; Vol. 125, No. October. pp. 194-198.
    @article{abe7afa1233247fca512c3ecf4418690,
    title = "Noise annoyance caused by continuous descent approaches compared to regular descent procedures",
    abstract = "During Continuous Descent Approaches (CDAs) aircraft glide towards the runway resulting in reduced noise and fuel usage. Here, we investigated whether such landings cause less noise annoyance than a regular stepwise approach. Both landing types were compared in a controlled laboratory setting with a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS), using four audio samples: an overflight during a regular approach (2000 ft altitude) and three aircraft performing CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000 ft. The samples at 2000 ft and 4000 ft were recorded at a countryside road, a 360° photo of which was used for the virtual visuals. The other two CDA samples were derived from the recording at 4000 ft. Participants were asked to rate all flyover samples twice while being immersed in the virtual environment. The CDA at 3000 ft was rated as most annoying, likely due to a longer overflight duration, followed by the regular descent and then the CDAs at 4000 and 5000 ft. As CDAs follow a fairly steady trajectory, it was estimated that they will increase annoyance within an area of approximately 2.5 km2, as compared to regular landings. Outside of this area, CDAs may instead result in less annoyance than regular landings.",
    author = "Kim White and Michael Arntzen and Francesco Walker and Waiyaki, {Fredrick M.} and Martijn Meeter and Adelbert Bronkhorst",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.04.008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "125",
    pages = "194--198",
    journal = "Applied acoustics",
    issn = "0003-682X",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "October",

    }

    Noise annoyance caused by continuous descent approaches compared to regular descent procedures. / White, Kim; Arntzen, Michael; Walker, Francesco ; Waiyaki, Fredrick M.; Meeter, Martijn; Bronkhorst, Adelbert.

    In: Applied acoustics, Vol. 125, No. October, 2017, p. 194-198.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Noise annoyance caused by continuous descent approaches compared to regular descent procedures

    AU - White, Kim

    AU - Arntzen, Michael

    AU - Walker, Francesco

    AU - Waiyaki, Fredrick M.

    AU - Meeter, Martijn

    AU - Bronkhorst, Adelbert

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - During Continuous Descent Approaches (CDAs) aircraft glide towards the runway resulting in reduced noise and fuel usage. Here, we investigated whether such landings cause less noise annoyance than a regular stepwise approach. Both landing types were compared in a controlled laboratory setting with a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS), using four audio samples: an overflight during a regular approach (2000 ft altitude) and three aircraft performing CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000 ft. The samples at 2000 ft and 4000 ft were recorded at a countryside road, a 360° photo of which was used for the virtual visuals. The other two CDA samples were derived from the recording at 4000 ft. Participants were asked to rate all flyover samples twice while being immersed in the virtual environment. The CDA at 3000 ft was rated as most annoying, likely due to a longer overflight duration, followed by the regular descent and then the CDAs at 4000 and 5000 ft. As CDAs follow a fairly steady trajectory, it was estimated that they will increase annoyance within an area of approximately 2.5 km2, as compared to regular landings. Outside of this area, CDAs may instead result in less annoyance than regular landings.

    AB - During Continuous Descent Approaches (CDAs) aircraft glide towards the runway resulting in reduced noise and fuel usage. Here, we investigated whether such landings cause less noise annoyance than a regular stepwise approach. Both landing types were compared in a controlled laboratory setting with a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS), using four audio samples: an overflight during a regular approach (2000 ft altitude) and three aircraft performing CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000 ft. The samples at 2000 ft and 4000 ft were recorded at a countryside road, a 360° photo of which was used for the virtual visuals. The other two CDA samples were derived from the recording at 4000 ft. Participants were asked to rate all flyover samples twice while being immersed in the virtual environment. The CDA at 3000 ft was rated as most annoying, likely due to a longer overflight duration, followed by the regular descent and then the CDAs at 4000 and 5000 ft. As CDAs follow a fairly steady trajectory, it was estimated that they will increase annoyance within an area of approximately 2.5 km2, as compared to regular landings. Outside of this area, CDAs may instead result in less annoyance than regular landings.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.04.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.04.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 125

    SP - 194

    EP - 198

    JO - Applied acoustics

    JF - Applied acoustics

    SN - 0003-682X

    IS - October

    ER -