Nominations, ratings, and the dimensions of sociometric status

Gerard H. Maassen, Jos L. van der Linden, Wies Akkermans

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)


    In 1944, U. Bronfenbrenner remarked on the need for a two-dimensional model of sociometric status. The low value of the correlation between the variables liking and disliking-assumed basic dimensions of sociometric status-is often cited as evidence for the correctness of Bronfenbrenner’ssuggestion. Sociometric status is derived from a coalescence of judgements at the individual level. In this article we argue that score attribution at this level (where one group member assesses another) is one-dimensional along the liking-disliking continuum. Two-dimensionality of sociometric status arises at the group level. However, we also show that at this level liking and disliking are not two distinct dimensions, but the poles of just one, the other being visibility (or impact). If the one-dimensional model of liking score attribution on the individual level is accepted, the obvious thing to do is to instruct respondents accordingly. Rating scales are suitable for this. The rating-scale methods we suggested in previous publications (e.g. Maassen, Akkermans, & van der Linden, 1996) are in keeping with this argument. Moreover, these methods may be recommended for their reliability, validity and for the variety of research designs to which they can be applied.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)179-199
    JournalInternational journal of behavioral development
    Publication statusPublished - 1997


    Dive into the research topics of 'Nominations, ratings, and the dimensions of sociometric status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this