Abstract
Nudging refers to the deliberate change in choice architecture (i.e., the careful design of the environments in which people make choices) with the goal of engineering a particular (benign) outcome. The core proposition of nudging is that seemingly innocuous alterations of choice architecture matter: they influence decision making. Typically, the early stages of decision making in construction projects have a long-term impact on project performance, but are at the same time often fraught with uncertainties. We experimentally examine if tweaking a trade-off matrix used to assess preliminary design options in a design competition can raise uncertainty awareness of decision makers and can nudge decision makers away from riskier, more uncertain options, towards less risky and uncertain options. First results indicate a statistically unreliable shift in the predicted direction. Based on our research results, we suggest and discuss other pertinent and potentially more effective nudges.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Engineering Project Organization Conference, EPOC 2016 |
Subtitle of host publication | June 28-30, 2016, Cle Elum, Washington, USA |
Editors | Jessica Kaminsky, Vedran Zerjav |
Place of Publication | Cle Elum, WA, USA |
Publisher | EPOS |
Number of pages | 10 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | Engineering Project Organization Conference 2016 - Cle Elum, United States Duration: 28 Jun 2016 → 30 Jun 2016 https://epossociety.org/epoc-2016 |
Publication series
Name | Working Paper Proceedings |
---|---|
Publisher | EPOS |
Volume | 2016 |
Conference
Conference | Engineering Project Organization Conference 2016 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | EPOC 2016 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Cle Elum |
Period | 28/06/16 → 30/06/16 |
Internet address |