This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.
|Number of pages||8|
|Journal||Comparative migration studies|
|Publication status||Published - 13 May 2019|
- Straw figure argument
- Immigrant integration
- n/a OA procedure