Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Fran Meissner

doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Fran Meissner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

Original language	English
Article number	18
Number of pages	8
Journal	Comparative migration studies
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y
Publication status	Published - 13 May 2019
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Superdiversity
Straw figure argument
Immigrant integration
Disintegration
ITC-CV
n/a OA procedure

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1186/s40878-019-0121-yLicence: CC BY

Meissner-2019-Of-straw-figures-and-multi-stakeholFinal published version, 364 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{db3cb92ede7a43ffa3d030fc46848fec,

title = "Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel",

abstract = "This article is a response to Willem Schinkel{\textquoteright}s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel{\textquoteright}s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is {\textquoteleft}against immigrant integration{\textquoteright} should be.",

keywords = "Superdiversity, Straw figure argument, Immigrant integration, Disintegration, ITC-CV, n/a OA procedure",

author = "Fran Meissner",

note = "M1 - 18",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "13",

doi = "10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

journal = "Comparative migration studies",

issn = "2214-594x",

publisher = "SpringerOpen",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring

T2 - a response to Willem Schinkel

AU - Meissner, Fran

N1 - M1 - 18

PY - 2019/5/13

Y1 - 2019/5/13

N2 - This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

AB - This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

KW - Superdiversity

KW - Straw figure argument

KW - Immigrant integration

KW - Disintegration

KW - ITC-CV

KW - n/a OA procedure

U2 - 10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

DO - 10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

M3 - Article

SN - 2214-594x

VL - 7

JO - Comparative migration studies

JF - Comparative migration studies

IS - 1

M1 - 18

ER -

Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this